Talk-Polywell.org

I don't know if I'd buy him a $7K amp, but I'd probably chip in something out of general interest, if grants aren't forthcoming and he changes his mind. It's interesting that he refuses aid. Tall Dave: Woodward is a scholar of the old school who has mores and morals that requires him not to accept ...

NBF has some more on this as well! Seems like Woodward claims to have repeatable and reversable thrust. This would be really cool! I hope it can turn out to actually work. http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/06/james-woodward-reports-consistent-and.html Guys: I'm not sure what Dr. Woodward’s next experim...

Small bit of news from P. March via NSF All: Actually it's a bit more than "small" news for this is the first time that Woodward has been getting consistent results that are well above his ARC-Lite Torque Pendulum's seismic noise platform of ~0.3 uN. And he now thinks he understands the phase relat...

I try correct my grammer with white smooke writer and only 2 or 3 errors get. And knew forums where don't carry of grammer but get ansvers. And heere we discus about my english 2 days and a get only one antwoth.From user from may country. Thank for your care about my English. Good by. Oh, for the s...

Theory blip on NSF from Paul March: All: When conversing with Jim Woodward and a friend of his last night, Dr. Woodward made the following observation worth noting about the Mach-Effect (M-E) and GRT in general. "The real problem in understanding Mach effects, I suspect, can be traced to a fundamen...

Chris: Thanks much for the follow up patent information. No worried. I was looking it up anyway as I am interested in it, even if I am very skeptical, so thanks for the further links. (Unlike some commentators here, I trust that you and I both know from experience that it is on our heads to fight f...

chrismb wrote:...from the USPTO Electronic Business Center portal:

Chris:

Thanks much for the follow up patent information. I talked with Woodward and it appears that CSUF dropped the ball on their agreement with Jim W to maintain his patents over time. Not sure what will happen next...

Paul, The report I found above contains no data and states it is a 'Progress Report', and therefore isn't a 'Proof of Principle Report'. A final report would properly contain the traditional sorts of data displays. But this is not a final report. Rather, it is a progress report. Data would also be ...

Noted. I sent a missive to Paul. 2000 Woodward and Mahood M-E Patent: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6347766.PN.&OS=PN/6347766&RS=PN/6347766 2010 M-E Proof of Principle report: http://forum.nasaspaceflig...

And all this fun because I brought up Ballard's unpublicized neolithic find in the Dardenelles. :? As I read some of the above, it all does seem to fit. Black Sea flood, folks relocate, DNA tracers, Farming Tech Tracers, Language Tracers, Culture Tracers, folk legend tracers...interesting stuff for...

so perhaps you would just be happier to follow the M-E experimental results that we continue to develop. I am totally hanging on your lips Paul. Please keep going with your expiments and dont hesitate to share your results. I am sceptical and I dont give it a high chance of success (sorry), but if ...

I don't really know what you're saying, but the words ". . .the momentum from an impulse must exist within. . ." are highly suspect to me. Its simply combining conservation of momentum with the limit of c. If an object experiences a change in momentum, an impulse, then momentum must be transfered t...

Was thinking about the grav-inertial force and came up with the following. F_Strong + F_Electro_Magnetic + F_Weak + F_Grav_Inertial = 0 So the sum of all the four forces is zero. 1) Electro-magnetic 2) Weak Nuclear 3) Strong Nuclear 4) Grav-Inertial Just a thought. Barry: In a closed universe, your...

Ron: We don’t have to wait on the experimental verification of John Cramer’s transactional based retro-causal experiment. Why? Because when it comes to already demonstrated action at a distance effects that exceed light speed look no further than the already verified experiments on QM entangled qua...

Here's some other ("wackier") concepts that Woodward relies pretty heavily on: -gravitational attraction as the origin of inertia -time-travelling reaction forces would cause inertial effects to behave "instantaneously" -4-d ripples in space-time shielding a "mass fluctuating" source from gravitati...