Talk-Polywell.org

Relatively stupid people like me? So, you seem to think a television is required to count bodies, or to even know what country you're flying over and bombing? What point are you trying to make?

Once again showing immense ignorance of history. Nevermind that it was discovered that the us was bombing cambodia illegally, and tried to cover it up. Or the massive civillian casualties inflicted by that campaign razing villages to the ground that the us lied about. Yeah those were just silly brai...

Do radical muslims not think pot is evil?

Are you familiar with Smedley Butler?

That isn't the point.

You've completely missed the point Diogenes. Well, I'm not going to keep repeating myself.

The only problem with that theory is that none of those people will be in the US. So if we're just a bunch of self-serving fusion scientists over here, why are we letting the entire US program be dismantled?

My issue with that would be, how do you determine who is a recipient? If you pass a law giving money to people, but they can only use that money to buy milk, do you let the Dairy farmers get a vote? Or if you create government subsidies to make ethanol, do corn farmers get a vote?

I don't like labels as much as you do. All I know is there is probably not a single person on the planet that I would agree with on everything. But, you can go ahead and keep throwing around your assumptions. It only impedes your understanding, not mine. It should be obvious to anyone that looked at...

At this rate, in ten years there will probably not be any serious US fusion programs. Which means that if you really want to study it, you'll need to leave the US and go to Europe, China, or Japan.

To me it sounds like the US fusion science program is being gutted.

I regard the use of "neocon" as if it were meaningful as code for "I'm a lefty and don't have a clue." You (apparently) have no clue. I'm not a lefty. Barry Goldwater and Eisenhower saw it coming before I ever said anything (or was alive). So, I guess your code is useless. Besides, why do you care?...

hanelyp wrote:

MSimon wrote:But that is the face of conservatism currently.

That is the face painted by it's opponents.

If you are talking about republicans, then they got a great help from their neocon base. The religious wackos.

Defined by whom? With enough tailoring, you can slice the definition it into as small of a sliver as you wish. Homosexuality is itself just a subsection of a larger group of deviant sexual behavior, and there are many sub categories of homosexuality as well. (of which "Butch" and Femme" are merely ...

Defined by whom? With enough tailoring, you can slice the definition it into as small of a sliver as you wish. Homosexuality is itself just a subsection of a larger group of deviant sexual behavior, and there are many sub categories of homosexuality as well. (of which "Butch" and Femme" are merely ...