Search found 92 matches
- Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:14 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
Of course it is not located in the clock, it's not like in large enough acceleration in a certain direction a pendulum clock getting stuck. Physical reality is four dimensional. It appears therefore more natural to think of physical reality as a four dimensional existence, instead of, as hitherto, t...
- Sun Nov 20, 2011 7:28 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
Well maybe term assume was not good, use might be better. You used equations that are based on ideal metal model, ideal electron gas model, which can give in certain limits useful results, like equations based on ideal physical gas model, but doesn't really represent physical reality so it gives cra...
- Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:03 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
http://rtn.elektronika.lt/mi/0304/2prins.pdf You seem to get out of equations that the electron density increases to infinity, and conclude that because of this eventually the average distance between electron will be smaller than Heisenberg principle for individual electron, thus forcing them to fo...
- Sun Nov 20, 2011 9:54 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
When it comes to Einstein and twin paradox:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox
Neither Einstein nor Langevin considered such results to be literally paradoxical: Einstein only called it "peculiar"...
- Sun Nov 20, 2011 9:49 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
I would have some questions about your original paper http://rtn.elektronika.lt/mi/0304/2prins.pdf So in your gap, why do you assume there is no electron-electron scattering, which is apparently at low temperatures the major if not main contributor to resistivity in many materials. For superconducto...
- Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:31 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
If I understood correctly, it's not that the acceleration would be causing some huge physical effects, but rather that when you apply mathematical tools that have limitations in a wrong way to situation were they are not supposed to be applied, the results can be total crap. If you apply Pythagorean...
- Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:31 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
Two inertial reference frames Kp and K with clocks at their origins. The clocks are synchronized and the two reference frames move away from one another at a relative speed v. The Lorentz transformation from Kp to K is given by: x=gamma*(xp+v*tp) and t=gamma*(tp+(v/c^2)*xp) The Lorentz transformati...
- Fri Nov 18, 2011 8:02 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
If clocks in different frames actually keep times differently (in their FOR), how could one ever measure c to be constant in any frame? A clock is required to measure c. If the clock runs slow, how could c be measured constant ? Michelson-Morley experiment and other animations here show it pretty w...
- Wed Nov 16, 2011 8:50 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
It seems according to both Newton and modern definition inertial reference frame must not be accelerating: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference All inertial frames are in a state of constant, rectilinear motion with respect to one another; they are not accelerating ----------- Ne...
- Wed Nov 16, 2011 7:57 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafele%E2%80%93Keating_experiment So when flying eastward the gravity will be larger than on the surface of the earth, so that the time dilation results are −59 ± 10 ns. But when flying westward, the gravity will smaller than on the surface of the earth, so that the time...
- Wed Nov 16, 2011 4:55 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
40 years later, no one has been able to refute Sachs' view of time in SR. Yet the accepted groupthink continues. Theory should provide something, predictions, based on which it can be tested. Refuting vague verbal acrobatics is kinda hard. Have you read his 1971 Physics Today article and the follow...
- Wed Nov 16, 2011 4:09 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
- Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:14 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
Have you maybe published papers based on this wrong Minkowski interpretation; and now refuse to admit that your publications might be wrong? Of course this could be a factor. However, based on your site's front page, the same "seeing what you want to see" could also be a factor the other way around...
- Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:57 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 659754
The postulates from 1905 paper: ...the same laws of electrodynamics and optics will be valid for all frames of reference for which the equations of mechanics hold good. We will raise this conjecture (the purport of which will hereafter be called the “Principle of Relativity”) to the status of a post...
- Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:21 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Frame Dragging Superconductors - M Tajmar
- Replies: 12
- Views: 6495
Also it is tagged Free Article, but apparently it requires registering, which should be free apparently. So that should work too, though, I'm too lazy to do that as long as i can just add my university's proxy url to the end .com and use that and my university account. :) physicsworld.com is IOP ass...