parallel wrote: I gave items 71 -73 presented to court (false statements cause legal problems for the writer) as evidence and asked what evidence you ladajo had, that showed the claims were wrong. As is clear from the exchange shown above, ladajo never provided any evidence, as he has none, and simply tried to change the subject.
So, you still can't prove that the ERV report is valid, other than some childish plea to authority:ladajo wrote:Let me help you (again...); I have never claimed the ERV report is wrong. Show me where I did.
What I have asked you repeatedly, is for you to prove the report is right, since you are so convinced it is, and yet you haven't seen it. All you have provided so far is Rossisaid.
So, prove to everyone the ERV report has proven Ecat to work. And while you are at it, you can also prove that Rossiclown has a Doctorate, as we are all still waiting for that from you as well. You keep making these assertions, but with no proof.
...which is clearly a repeated attempt by you to gloss over that "items 71 -73" are simply a "claim" made by Rossiclown, and nothing more.presented to court (false statements cause legal problems for the writer)
You also still can't prove that Rossiclown has a Doctorate.
We are all now waiting for you to prove two claims; Doctorate, and ERV is right.
And no, Rossisaid's don't count as proof. Eventually, you will come to understand that.