The Super Supercapacitor.

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

DeltaV
Posts: 2245
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:05 am

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by DeltaV »

skippy wrote:
GIThruster wrote:Did they give a specific energy density as compared to LiPo's?
I found a bug on the Nature website and was able to read part of the paper. It looked like their highest energy design had about 10^-2 Wh/cc. That's about two orders of magnitude lower than Li-ions. They could be nice caps for other reasons --I didn't study the paper that closely. But it doesn't look like their energy density is going to even be able to challenge existing battery chemistry (unsurprisingly).
Let's see...

1 Mlb or 453 600 kg vehicle, say (747-8 equivalent),
10 minutes at (very roughly) 5 GW to reach orbit,
(10/60 h)(5 000 000 000 W) = 833 333 333 propulsive Wh required,
overall efficiency, say, 75% --> 833 333 333/0.75 = 1 111 111 110 stored Wh required,
(1 111 111 110 Wh)/(0.01 Wh/cm^3) = 111 111 111 000 cm^3 for energy storage,
(111 111 111 000 cm^3)(1 m/100 cm)^3 = 111 111 m^3,
so the capacitors needed could fit into a cube with edge length of (111 111 m^3)^(1/3) = 48 m or 158 ft.

Bigger than my backyard, just for energy storage. No beer cooler. No go.

Teahive
Posts: 362
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:09 pm

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by Teahive »

GIThruster wrote:The real issue with the folks making it with a Lightscribe is they found a cheap process for manufacturing it.
I wonder about the quality achievable with this method, though. Press articles just mentioning the fact that graphene is a layer just a single atom thick always make it sound as if they just produce a single macroscopic, planar molecule. But from the photos and Figure 2c (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v4 ... s2446.html) it's pretty obvious that it's more like a collection of curled flakes of various sizes.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Re: The Super Supercapacitor.

Post by MSimon »

JoeP wrote:
ladajo wrote:Why would leakage be a hurdle?
Existing dielectrics seem fine. Especially for normal applications. The graphene would seem a nice cheap and low mass/volume alternative to existing charge plates/films.
I'm not current on the latest capacitor specs, it was just my recollection that most capacitors has self-discharge rates that were inferior to batteries. That, and energy density was another thing that needed improvement.
That is correct. Say you are using one to power a 32KHz osc for back up time. 1uA current draw. The super caps self discharge will run from 1/2 that to 2X that depending. Roughly. Film caps are much better. But they don't hold much charge.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Post Reply