Re: More Helion Energy news....
Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2019 12:06 am
I agree. The NIAC funding was not quite enough to get this project completed, but I am sure that they will have enough funding once Helion get's their reactor going.
a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
https://talk-polywell.org/bb/
Could very well be true.mvanwink5 wrote:It may also be a function of the ability of Helion to handle another huge project. They are right in the middle of developing, building, testing their reactor. Likely they are not pushing this other project.
https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/radi ... 1892053323Bo Cole
Helion Energy | Talent Acquisition | Process Lover | Data Seeker | Relationship Builder
Helion Energy is building the world’s first clean, safe, fusion energy generator to battle climate change in a major way! We're looking for engineers and scientists with expertise in producing and handling medical radioisotopes to join our already amazing technical team. Working with our diverse team of scientists and engineers you will help design, implement, and test medical isotope and fusion fuel storage, injection, purification, and handling systems. You’ll be leveraging the industry’s vast knowledge of related research to invent commercially-relevant systems and get in on the ground floor of a dynamic, world leading, clean energy company.
Note: This is an on-site role in our Redmond, WA office and requires US Citizenship
Responsibilities
Lead all steps of the design and implementation of Helium-3 and related radioisotope storage, purification, and processing systems
Build and test prototype gas handling systems
Perform theoretical and experimental materials, thermal management, and radiochemistry analyses
Ensure all required safety, licensing, and regulatory processes and registrations are acquired and current
You will enjoy this role if you...
Are enthusiastic about ending climate change
Are passionate about learning all there is to know in a deeply technical fields – and inventing what is not yet known
Care deeply about building safe, reliable commercial systems
Learn quickly and thrive in a rapidly changing environment
Requirements
MS or Ph.D. in related disciplines
Detailed knowledge of the transport and chemical phenomena of volatile gases with vacuum seals, pumps, etc.
4+ years of hands-on work experience in radiochemistry, radiopharmaceuticals, and/or radioisotope production
Related certifications (CGMP, NQA-1, RSO, CHP) preferred
About Helion Energy
Helion Energy is the world’s leading fusion energy company – we aren’t just dreamers with an idea, we are a world class team realizing a goal - making safe, clean, energy a reality today. Helion has broken the traditional barriers that have held fusion back, is a decade ahead of any other competitor, and will finally be addressing climate change on a scale that makes a real difference.
If this is true (and I do not see any reason why they should lie considering that they are not looking for new funding) this single ability would put them on the forefront of all other contestant for the adoption of future fusion technology.Skipjack wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2020 11:34 pmAnother bit of information is that they seem to be very happy with their ability to recapture a good share of the power they are putting into the reactor for each pulse. David has been emphasizing that this is one key aspect that make their technology superior to other fusion reactor concepts. How much exactly they can recapture is unfortunately a well kept secret. What I do know is that it is good enough for their reactor to be economic with a Q of 5 vs 30+ for other reactor designs (e.g.Tokamaks). So make your own conclusions about that.
Nice to see you back on TP after the break Skipjack!Skipjack wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2020 11:34 pmHelion has been slowly inching towards break even. Unfortunately they are extremely tight lipped about their progress. They have been even more so since the Alpha program ended.
The information that I think I can disclose is putting them somewhere in the 10^20 keV * s/m3 range. Note that those are with their last prototype Venti.
Helion was very happy with Venti which exceeded expectations on confinement and neutron production by a factor of two.
Thanks bud! It is good to be back. After all these years, everyone here is a bit like extended family to me. Hope to see more people return now that the forum is back up!
Most of the things that I have said are actually available to the public, if you know where to look. I post updates here occasionally. There are also personal reasons why I know a few small(!) extra bits every now and then. Though, I should add that my access is rather limited and on top of that, I can't always say all the things I know.crowberry wrote: ↑Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:49 pmIt is interesting what you report about Helion Energy as they have really been secretive the last few years about their achievements and activities. Out of curiosity I ask how you know what Helion Energy is doing?
TAE Technology was really secretive to the public and without a website for many years, but they kept publishing patents and conference contributions. Helion Energy has a website, but they almost never update it, but they don't seem to publish papers nor patents since several years.
Ashamed to admit that I didn't know that Helion was affiliated with that; especially considering that it is apparently my current favorite fusion rocket design by John Slough:Skipjack wrote: ↑Thu Aug 27, 2020 2:37 pmAs for propulsion applications: It could theoretically be used if you opened up one end and let the plasma out that way, but I think there are better designs for this application. Don't forget that MSNW (which Helion essentially spun off from) has a design for an actual fusion rocket engine (Fusion Driven Rocket, which is much more suitable for this. Unfortunately that one is not funded right now.
Thank you Skipjack for your comparison of Helion Energy and TAE. You are right about that Helion Energy is hiring more and more people. Currently they have this list of open positions:Skipjack wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 7:47 amThanks bud! It is good to be back. After all these years, everyone here is a bit like extended family to me. Hope to see more people return now that the forum is back up!
Most of the things that I have said are actually available to the public, if you know where to look. I post updates here occasionally. There are also personal reasons why I know a few small(!) extra bits every now and then. Though, I should add that my access is rather limited and on top of that, I can't always say all the things I know.crowberry wrote: ↑Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:49 pmIt is interesting what you report about Helion Energy as they have really been secretive the last few years about their achievements and activities. Out of curiosity I ask how you know what Helion Energy is doing?
TAE Technology was really secretive to the public and without a website for many years, but they kept publishing patents and conference contributions. Helion Energy has a website, but they almost never update it, but they don't seem to publish papers nor patents since several years.
TAE and Helion are in different positions.
Helion (for now) has enough funding to do what they need to do, while TAE needs A LOT of money in order to move forward.
They also are rather far behind Helion in many aspects. E.g. Helion has achieved fusion (and the neutrons to proof it) a long time ago and they are quite ahead of TAE in terms of triple product. Now, I don't want to seem like I am bashing TAE. Their approach is very different (steady state vs pulsed) and they are reaching much higher. Helion is taking a sort of "low hanging fruit" approach. That has always been their thing. Originally they wanted to "just" do fusion- fission- hybrids (for a start anyway), which don't even require a Q of 1 to work. Unfortunately, as I am told, fusion- fission- hybrids are a tough sell. It is mainly a cultural problem. The fission guys don't want any of that "complicated fusion stuff" and the fusion guys don't want any of that "dirty fission stuff" (both is pretty silly in a way but shows that people have their prejudices and biases).
In a way (and I am conjecting from history here, so take this with a grain of salt), this might have harmed their ability to attract funding in the early days. After that, they looked into T+D fusion as an intermediate step, especially when it came to government grants. The government does not seem to "believe" that "advanced" fuels like D+He3 would be viable any time soon. The thing is though, that Helion's reactor design is very suitable for D+He3 (or it should probably be better referred to as He3 boosted D+D) for a lot of reasons that (I believe) were sufficiently discussed here earlier.
The other reason why Helion is so quiet is that they got burned, badly(!) in the early days, when they were actively looking for funding. Back then, they released some forward looking statements that assumed perfect funding and manpower and pretty much everything going exactly as planned. The science press took and reported that as "will happen that way", which created a lot of hype. The problem was that the funding for that sort of accelerated progress was simply not there at the time. So they of course could not get there within those (ideal) time frames. That in turn caused critics to denounce them as "unreliable" and"not trustworthy". One website even called them "a fraud". Thankfully, they were able to get funding through ARPA-E. ARPA-E was literally a life line (and has been to many small scale fusion outfits). When Helion reached or even exceeded their ARPA- E milestones, the private funding started coming in as it validated them as being able to achieve what they promised. Then they got more funding through ARPA-E Alpha, which gave them the opportunity to gain more investor confidence by demonstrating some of the more risky concepts. Now they have enough funding to go forward and they have a full scale (or near full scale) prototype operational. I am not trying to overhype them. To my understanding, there are still a few things that could go wrong. That is another reason why they are so quiet. No more hype creating promises. David Kirtley said that he won't publish any result until they are peer reviewed and even then he is hesitant. And quite frankly, they don't need to right now.
One thing that should be sort of telling is that they have been (very) actively hiring...
https://jobs.lever.co/helionenergyEngineer, Fusion
Redmond Washington
Engineer, Radioisotope
Redmond Washington
Engineer, Simulation ( ANSYS )
Redmond Washington
Engineer, Thermal
Redmond Washington
Engineer/Scientist, Materials
Redmond Washington
Glassblower, Senior
Redmond Washington
Group Leader, Capacitor Development & Production
Redmond Washington
Mechanical Assembler
Redmond Washington
Principal Engineer, Electrical Engineering
Redmond Washington
Scientist, Nuclear
Redmond Washington
Scientist, Plasma - Computational
Redmond Washington
Scientist, Plasma - Experimental
Redmond Washington
Systems Engineer, Mechanical
Redmond Washington