What a miracle!KitemanSA wrote:YADA YADA YADA. Endo or exo. Please answer.Joseph Chikva wrote:Oops, I missed your question.KitemanSA wrote: By the way, you didn't answer. Would the reaction be endo or exo thermic? Please answer. Simple question, simple answer. Endo or exo?
What's problem in calculation?
Add mass of two nuclei separately and compare with mass of prospective nucleus mass.In general, unless there is something unknown (or at least novel) at work, the probability that such a reaction will result in anything but the re-emission of the proton is miniscual. However, since there has been little real investigation of low energy proton:Ni interaction in a lattice, I don't pretend to know that there is no chance of unknown or novel interactivity.Then he wrote: The next and bigger question: is that reaction possible in general?.Not sure what you are gettin at here. The cross section for p-p is miniscual and the probability of simultaneous combination of 4 particles is smaller than remote. What of it?Then he wrote: PS: What do you think, why people try to fuse He4 using D-T or D-He3 reactions and donot try the direct way - to take two protons and two neutrons for further merging?
Do you know of a way to use a lattice to change that probability? Do you think yourself omniscient and claim there is NO such possibility? And since NEITHER is what is being discussed vis-a-vis the Rossi Reactor, why did you bring this totally inane issue up? Are you constitutionally unable to carry on a meaningful conversation?
He knows also cross section. So,knows that some reactions are more probable than anothers. How about grandmother who becoming grandfather? Pardon, polaritons, Bose-Einstein and Rydberg matter? Or are there other versions?
On base of today's knowledge that reaction Ni62+p in crystal lattice will give nothing else than Nickel Hydride with some energy release.