Energy conversion...
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:12 pm
- Location: Michigan
Energy conversion...
This might not be "bleeding edge" enough for this crowd, but I haven't noticed this on the board.
http://www.askmar.com/Fusion_files/Venetian%20Blind.pdf
It's from Livermore, so you may already have it...
http://www.askmar.com/Fusion_files/Venetian%20Blind.pdf
It's from Livermore, so you may already have it...
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:12 pm
- Location: Michigan
If the gyroradius of the alphas is smaller than the "holes" in the donuts then the alphas should just come out of the holes. It depends on the magnetic fields. A 3T field with a 1 m hole works. Scale that up or down (6T field for .5 m hole for example).Heath_h49008 wrote:With a WB type core, we should have a good idea of where our high energy products will exit. Unless I'm forgetting something, we should have predictable "hot spots" that correspond to the cusp openings.
Since the assumed parameter for a working reactor is 10 T for a 2 m hole it should work fine.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
If you search back thru the old topics, you will find a series of postings with some pretty good graphics of such a system integrated with a Polywell. However, it was then dropped because "oops, the alphas go out in every direction!" Only after the topic had been dropped for numerous months did Dr. N. say, "nope, the alphas would preferentially exit the cusps after all". Maybe it is time to reprise the old discussions?
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:12 pm
- Location: Michigan
weeell.. not really. If polywell works as stamped, I might even agree the alphas come out predictably. The issue isn't the distribution of their directions but the distribution of their energies, as MSimon states [actually demonstrating *some* knowledge of the plasma physics well enough].KitemanSA wrote:If you search back thru the old topics, you will find a series of postings with some pretty good graphics of such a system integrated with a Polywell. However, it was then dropped because "oops, the alphas go out in every direction!" Only after the topic had been dropped for numerous months did Dr. N. say, "nope, the alphas would preferentially exit the cusps after all". Maybe it is time to reprise the old discussions?
IIRC, the discussions back then spent a significant effort on handling the distribution of energies. Don't condemn until you read.chrismb wrote: weeell.. not really. If polywell works as stamped, I might even agree the alphas come out predictably. The issue isn't the distribution of their directions but the distribution of their energies, as MSimon states [actually demonstrating *some* knowledge of the plasma physics well enough].
Direct Conversion
Yes, you do.KitemanSA wrote:IIRC, the discussions back then spent a significant effort on handling the distribution of energies. Don't condemn until you read.
The real question is: if it works how many grids are needed such that the released energy cost is lowest.
Insanity Rules!
Re: Direct Conversion
And that question is not only one of the number of grids but also how to handle the residual heat load.mad_derek wrote:Yes, you do.KitemanSA wrote:IIRC, the discussions back then spent a significant effort on handling the distribution of energies. Don't condemn until you read.
The real question is: if it works how many grids are needed such that the released energy cost is lowest.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
I read, commented, re-read, re-commented, &c. and now feel well placed to condemn. Show me the extra-ordinary proof this extra-ordinary thing can work, and whoever does so will get a "fancy that, it works!!" out of me.KitemanSA wrote: IIRC, the discussions back then spent a significant effort on handling the distribution of energies. Don't condemn until you read.
It is not extraordinary chris. As far as I can tell it is just electrostatics. If you can accelerate particles with electrostatics why can't you decelerate them?chrismb wrote:I read, commented, re-read, re-commented, &c. and now feel well placed to condemn. Show me the extra-ordinary proof this extra-ordinary thing can work, and whoever does so will get a "fancy that, it works!!" out of me.KitemanSA wrote: IIRC, the discussions back then spent a significant effort on handling the distribution of energies. Don't condemn until you read. :wink:
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.