General fusion - recent patent reject.

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
chrismb
Posts: 3161
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:00 pm

General fusion - recent patent reject.

Post by chrismb »

Regrettably, General Fusion's current patent got a rejection in October. It is a non-final rejection so they can appeal, but it bode's poorly; they abandoned their last one in similar circumstances.

Just a few choice paragraphs that might give a reference of interest:

Image

Image

Giorgio
Posts: 3065
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: China, Italy

Post by Giorgio »

I think it was about time that the USPTO moved from "we patent everything" to "we patent only if you give solid evidence that it will indeed work".

While I am sad for Tri-Alpha and General Fusion I think it will push them (and everyone else) to work more on getting actual experimental results to support their patent applications.

In the long run this might be a good news afer all.

Skipjack
Posts: 6812
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Post by Skipjack »

I thought that General fusion had already had a prototype that produced fusion (though it was single pulse use only via small explosives).

Giorgio
Posts: 3065
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: China, Italy

Post by Giorgio »

I think they had something like that, but anyhow is not the same system they are asking a patent for.

chrismb, can you post a link to the full rejection letter?

chrismb
Posts: 3161
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:00 pm

Post by chrismb »

I have just spotted that two new General Fusion patents have hit the patent journals.

It looks like the patent US20100163130 is getting no further attention, following a non-final rejection in October.

Two new patents have appeared, dated 3rd Feb;
US20110026657 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPRESSING PLASMA
US20110026658 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PLASMA COMPRESSION WITH RECYCLING OF PROJECTILES

It's a case of try, try and try again, I guess.

Or in General Fusion's case; try, try, try, try try and if that doesn't work then then start trying two at a time!....

kurt9
Posts: 589
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA

Post by kurt9 »

Giorgio wrote:I think it was about time that the USPTO moved from "we patent everything" to "we patent only if you give solid evidence that it will indeed work".

While I am sad for Tri-Alpha and General Fusion I think it will push them (and everyone else) to work more on getting actual experimental results to support their patent applications.

In the long run this might be a good news afer all.
Agreed. The patent office took a lot of flak for issuing patents for "business methods" and the like back in the day. It was Bezo's patent application for the "single-click" ordering on Amazon that took the cake.

Nik
Posts: 181
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:14 pm
Location: UK

clickety-clack...

Post by Nik »

Didn't a bunch of such ambitious applications fail due to the prior art of Teletext/Ceefax system in UK, where handset's coloured buttons select menu options and, waaay before those, Heinlein's classic 'Beyond this Horizon' where protagonist clicks the 'Tell Me More' during a news bulletin ??

Post Reply