Dynomak In The News and Polywell Too
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:21 am
a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
https://talk-polywell.org/bb/
I was going to fire an email to him given the correspondence aceshigh shared. But I was wondering, the crux of the first wall issue has everything to do with the material that is used to make up the inner wall between the plasma and heat exchanger correct? That is what ever material you choose, the options we currently have all have the same problem; i.e neutron embrittlement. Is that correctmvanwink5 wrote:Has anyone asked Sutherland about 1st wall yet? Clearly that detail has been vetted in their penciled economics or else the pencilled economics had a shredded last page...
It is only a matter of time for EMC2 to have backing for their first risk reducing project step, surely? Let's hope it is not like the $1.5M table scraps thrown on the floor for Helion by Mithril Capital and YCombinator... On the other hand, it may be that that is all that would be required to shred the last WB-D doubt and trigger serious cash and heat up the Dark Horse fusion race?
Stay tuned, I am sure we will find out what didn't happened bit by....xx years... bit.
If you do tritium suppressed (and HE boosted) pulsed DD Fusion, like Helion does, the neutrons are a lot less of a problem.D Tibbets wrote: Certainly D-T and to a lesser extent D-D fuel will produce lots of neutrons
I fired off an email to Derek Sutherland and got the following response about the first wall issuesmvanwink5 wrote:Has anyone asked Sutherland about 1st wall yet? Clearly that detail has been vetted in their penciled economics or else the pencilled economics had a shredded last page...
It is only a matter of time for EMC2 to have backing for their first risk reducing project step, surely? Let's hope it is not like the $1.5M table scraps thrown on the floor for Helion by Mithril Capital and YCombinator... On the other hand, it may be that that is all that would be required to shred the last WB-D doubt and trigger serious cash and heat up the Dark Horse fusion race?
Stay tuned, I am sure we will find out what didn't happened bit by....xx years... bit.
edit:
After further story of Helion chasing, it looks like the $1.5M to Helion is part of a risk management funding roadmap with series B staged for late mid 2015 assuming testing milestones met along the way.
He also extended an offer to do a "Ask me [Derek Sutherland] anything" at some point.Derek Sutherland wrote: Using inductive helicity injection as opposed to electrostatic, we do not have line tying to our electrodes and thus we don't have a diverted magnetic topology like SSPX. We also do not pull nulls in any location that leads to an intersection of magnetic field lines with the wall. As a result, the power is assumed to come out isotropically on the first wall with ~ 1 MW m^-2 wall loading and a high neutral density at the edge that helps take the power out radiatively as well. This whole topic is a key issue to address in the next experiment, HIT-SIX, which seeks to demonstrate IDCD in higher temperature plasmas. I do have a few ideas of how the power exhaust will work more microscopically with a high temperature plasma, but I'm going to wait for the next experiment that seeks to address this issue in more reactor relevant conditions before really describing it in detail... there's only so much you can do with theoretical and computational calculations.