Spherical Tokamaks

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

crowberry
Posts: 454
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:34 am

Spherical Tokamaks

Postby crowberry » Wed Aug 12, 2015 7:36 am

The Spherical Tokamak (ST) is a hot topic because it seems to have favourable stability properties compared to a traditional tokamak and in addition to that the additional benefits of smaller size, faster development cycles and lower cost. Dennis Whyte of MIT has been promoting the ST design called Affordable Replacable Compact (ARC). MIT has a new press release on ARC:
http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2015/small-modular-efficient-fusion-plant-0810#.Vcn7xPR5qw8.twitter

Here is the latest paper (paywalled) about the ARC design: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379615302337

I expect to hear a lot more about Spherical Tokamaks in the next few years. I would not be too surprised to see a company being formed around ARC in a similar way as the UK based Tokamak Energy is working on their own High Temperature Superconductor designs.

Skipjack
Posts: 5953
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: Spherical Tokamaks

Postby Skipjack » Wed Aug 12, 2015 4:18 pm

crowberry wrote:The Spherical Tokamak (ST) is a hot topic because it seems to have favourable stability properties compared to a traditional tokamak and in addition to that the additional benefits of smaller size, faster development cycles and lower cost. Dennis Whyte of MIT has been promoting the ST design called Affordable Replacable Compact (ARC). MIT has a new press release on ARC:
http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2015/small-modular-efficient-fusion-plant-0810#.Vcn7xPR5qw8.twitter

Here is the latest paper (paywalled) about the ARC design: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379615302337

I expect to hear a lot more about Spherical Tokamaks in the next few years. I would not be too surprised to see a company being formed around ARC in a similar way as the UK based Tokamak Energy is working on their own High Temperature Superconductor designs.

Hehehe, ARC, someone has been reading too many comics ;)

Giorgio
Posts: 2658
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: China, Italy

Re: Spherical Tokamaks

Postby Giorgio » Wed Aug 12, 2015 5:59 pm

crowberry wrote:Here is the latest paper (paywalled) about the ARC design: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920379615302337


Here is the un-paywalled paper for the curious ones:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3540
Look, stars!

Tom Ligon
Posts: 1870
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:23 am
Location: Northern Virginia
Contact:

Re: Spherical Tokamaks

Postby Tom Ligon » Thu Aug 13, 2015 3:43 am

Dr. Bussard liked spheromaks. We had a visit from Paul Koloc one day, where they discussed their ideas for fusion. Paul was using spheromaks as a model for ball lightning at that point. Essentially, a spheromak's shape is so natural for the magnetic fields that it can exist without the physical machine.

Skipjack
Posts: 5953
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: Spherical Tokamaks

Postby Skipjack » Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:56 pm

I definitely like it better than other tokamaks. I wonder how favorably it compares to the Dynomak from the UW.
Still, it only doing T+D which means you have all the problems coming with that. I believe (but I am not sure), that the Dynomak can theoretically do D+D/He3 (though they will have T+D side reactions due to being steady state).

TheRadicalModerate
Posts: 145
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 4:19 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: Spherical Tokamaks

Postby TheRadicalModerate » Fri Aug 21, 2015 5:02 pm

Tom Ligon wrote:Dr. Bussard liked spheromaks. We had a visit from Paul Koloc one day, where they discussed their ideas for fusion. Paul was using spheromaks as a model for ball lightning at that point. Essentially, a spheromak's shape is so natural for the magnetic fields that it can exist without the physical machine.


Note that "spheromak" and "spherical tokamak" have nothing to do with one another.

Solo
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Spherical Tokamaks

Postby Solo » Fri Aug 21, 2015 6:14 pm

You have to read between the lines a bit to understand this proposal. MIT is going to be forced to shut down C-Mod, their high-field tokamak. They would like to continue by building a new, higher-field tokamak. I'd give both this and the dynomak a snowball's chance in hell of being built in the current funding climate though. The ARC design is pretty much a Hail Mary pass. That doesn't mean it's not a good idea though, just that most ideas, even good ones, are not going to get funding right now. Not from the Fedigov at any rate.

Skipjack
Posts: 5953
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: Spherical Tokamaks

Postby Skipjack » Sat Aug 22, 2015 8:08 am

Solo wrote:, just that most ideas, even good ones, are not going to get funding right now. Not from the Fedigov at any rate.

Helion got some government funding. But I agree, funding for fusion under the Obama administration has been shit. Not that it was much better under Bush, either. If I was a conspiracy nut, I would say that they are all in the pocket of coal and oil.

hanelyp
Posts: 2237
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:50 pm

Re: Spherical Tokamaks

Postby hanelyp » Sat Aug 22, 2015 4:41 pm

The conservative political position asks why taxpayers should pay for something or government should pick winners and losers, energy research in this case.

The current putz occupying the White House has policies consistent with wanting energy poverty, and using energy policy to launder money to cronies.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.

swamijake
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 4:09 pm
Location: Vancouver, B.C.

Re: Spherical Tokamaks

Postby swamijake » Mon Aug 24, 2015 6:25 pm

Not sure how this discussion is relevant to the topic. From what I can glean, the spherical tokamak is a similar to a regular tokamak except the central portion of the toroid magnets is shared by all the segments. Some designs have this central pole basically exposed to plasma.

Apparently the skinnier you can make that central pole the better the stability. Not sure how you heat the plasma as effectively as this eliminates the inner poloidal coils, but I suppose you can just blast it with RF or neutral beam injection.

Its a bit confusing as Spheromak is an entirely different entity. If you peeled an orange and stuck a pencil down the center it would look pretty close to a Spherical Tokamak, so maybe we can call it the Orange-o-mak?

crowberry
Posts: 454
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:34 am

Re: Spherical Tokamaks

Postby crowberry » Tue Oct 25, 2016 7:44 pm

The NSTX-U has unfortunately a malfunctioning magnet, which can take up to a year to fix.
http://www.nature.com/news/us-left-with-just-one-working-fusion-reactor-for-now-1.20710

crowberry
Posts: 454
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:34 am

Re: Spherical Tokamaks

Postby crowberry » Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:48 pm

Reparing NSTX-U is a long term project. Here the status of the project is described:
Abstract: YO5.00002 : Status and Plans for the NSTX-U Recovery Project

The NSTX Upgrade device began operation in 2016 and performed 10 weeks of commissioning activities and initial scientific research. However, a number of technical issues, including the failure of a divertor magnetic field coil, resulted in the suspension of operations. In response, a facility-wide “Extent of Condition” review was initiated at the request of the Department of Energy. This review generated a comprehensive corrective action plan and organization of a dedicated “Recovery Project” to enable NSTX-U to be the most capable Spherical Tokamak in the world program while also improving facility reliability. There are eight major scope items in the NSTX-U Recovery Project including: (1) six redesigned inner PF coils, (2) redesigned upper and lower polar region structures, (3) redesigned select plasma facing components, (4) improved bake-out, (5) additional component stress/strain trending instrumentation, (6) enhanced test cell shielding, (7) implementation of the accelerator safety order, and (8) reassembly of NSTX-U components with improved alignment. Progress, status, and plans for the NSTX-U Recovery Project will be described.


http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/DPP18/Session/YO5.2


Return to “News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests