Thermal battery with 6-8 times the energy density of lithium

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Carl White
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:44 pm

Thermal battery with 6-8 times the energy density of lithium

Postby Carl White » Mon Apr 01, 2019 10:35 am

Molten silicon. Grid-level storage, not for vehicles. They claim 60%-80% the cost of lithium.

https://newatlas.com/cct-silicon-energy ... age/59098/

(not an April fools article)

Aero
Posts: 1200
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:36 am
Location: 92111

Re: Thermal battery with 6-8 times the energy density of lithium

Postby Aero » Mon Apr 01, 2019 10:23 pm

I didn't see Rossi's picture in the article, but a thermal generator with only 3 moving parts? Suggests thermoelectric generator with efficiencies ranging from 6% to 15%, that doesn't seem like a very good deal to me.
Aero

RERT
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 9:10 pm

Re: Thermal battery with 6-8 times the energy density of lithium

Postby RERT » Tue Apr 02, 2019 10:07 am

If all they have done is increase the effective life an order of magnitude at constant outlay it seems quite significant.

Li-ion even at $100/kWh is 1-10 cents per kWh with a lifetime of 10,000-1,000 cycles. The bottom end of that range gives very expensive power. If they really can deliver 25 years of diurnal cycling, moving to the top end of the range, the cost of intermittency of renewables starts to look reasonable - provided annual maintenance for the (glowing red-hot) packages isn't too high....

FWIW 1.2 MWh in a shipping container is doesn't seem like 6-8 times Li-ion to me.

paperburn1
Posts: 2454
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
Location: Third rock from the sun.

Re: Thermal battery with 6-8 times the energy density of lithium

Postby paperburn1 » Tue Apr 02, 2019 12:46 pm

Climate Change Technologies, also known as CCT Energy Storage, has launched its TED (Thermal Energy Device) with a set of remarkable claims.

Remarkable claims require remarkable proof. I have yet to see either in this case.
Pumped hydro still remains the cheapest most economical way to store energy. IMHO
Sites abound but due to environmentalist and NIMBY (Not in my back yard) thinking this idea will never get off the ground.
Maybe we should start over and give the cockroaches a chance.
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.

Aero
Posts: 1200
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:36 am
Location: 92111

Re: Thermal battery with 6-8 times the energy density of lithium

Postby Aero » Tue Apr 02, 2019 3:28 pm

paperburn1 wrote:Climate Change Technologies, also known as CCT Energy Storage, has launched its TED (Thermal Energy Device) with a set of remarkable claims.

Remarkable claims require remarkable proof. I have yet to see either in this case.
Pumped hydro still remains the cheapest most economical way to store energy. IMHO
Sites abound but due to environmentalist and NIMBY (Not in my back yard) thinking this idea will never get off the ground.
Maybe we should start over and give the cockroaches a chance.


"Remarkable claims require remarkable proof." Yes, or at least some claims to be proven.

If this storage system has very low efficiency, (thermoelectric generator to recover power) then it would be very wasteful to store any kind of expensive generated power. Converting grid energy into heat then recovering 1W for every 6W stored seems excessively lossy to me.
Aero

alexjrgreen
Posts: 813
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:03 pm
Location: UK

Re: Thermal battery with 6-8 times the energy density of lithium

Postby alexjrgreen » Tue Apr 02, 2019 4:09 pm

paperburn1 wrote:Remarkable claims require remarkable proof.

This is equivalent to "Unremarkable claims require little or no proof.", which is clearly false.

Claims require proof. There is only one standard.
Ars artis est celare artem.

Carl White
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: Thermal battery with 6-8 times the energy density of lithium

Postby Carl White » Wed Apr 03, 2019 5:31 am

Aero wrote:I didn't see Rossi's picture in the article, but a thermal generator with only 3 moving parts? Suggests thermoelectric generator with efficiencies ranging from 6% to 15%, that doesn't seem like a very good deal to me.


I guess that would depend on the inputs to the grid. If there's going to be a fair wind/solar component, I imagine (not an expert) that it's necessary to add enough so that there is generally an oversupply of power to ensure an undersupply is rare. So as long as the average oversupply exceeds the amount demanded of the battery by 1 over that 0.06 to 0.15, the relative costs of the batteries themselves would be what matters.

hanelyp
Posts: 2255
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:50 pm

Re: Thermal battery with 6-8 times the energy density of lithium

Postby hanelyp » Tue Apr 09, 2019 1:37 am

Aero wrote:I didn't see Rossi's picture in the article, but a thermal generator with only 3 moving parts? Suggests thermoelectric generator with efficiencies ranging from 6% to 15%, that doesn't seem like a very good deal to me.

I've read of Stirling-electric generators with a grand total of 2 moving parts, not counting heat input and waste heat rejection.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.

t_c
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 2:28 am

Re: Thermal battery with 6-8 times the energy density of lithium

Postby t_c » Mon Apr 22, 2019 2:59 am

alexjrgreen wrote:
paperburn1 wrote:Remarkable claims require remarkable proof.

This is equivalent to "Unremarkable claims require little or no proof.", which is clearly false.

Claims require proof. There is only one standard.


lol, in your daily life I'm sure you aren't asking anyone for proof if they say they own a car, but you're gonna want evidence if they say they own the batmobile

alexjrgreen
Posts: 813
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:03 pm
Location: UK

Re: Thermal battery with 6-8 times the energy density of lithium

Postby alexjrgreen » Tue Apr 23, 2019 7:59 am

t_c wrote:
alexjrgreen wrote:
paperburn1 wrote:Remarkable claims require remarkable proof.

This is equivalent to "Unremarkable claims require little or no proof.", which is clearly false.

Claims require proof. There is only one standard.


lol, in your daily life I'm sure you aren't asking anyone for proof if they say they own a car, but you're gonna want evidence if they say they own the batmobile

In Science, there is only one standard.

In daily life, "there's one born every minute".
Ars artis est celare artem.

paperburn1
Posts: 2454
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
Location: Third rock from the sun.

Re: Thermal battery with 6-8 times the energy density of lithium

Postby paperburn1 » Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:43 am

hmmm,,,, thermel electric seems to be the new gig.

https://cleantechnica.com/2019/06/17/si ... ge-system/
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.


Return to “News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests