Polywell 3D model

Discuss the technical details of an "open source" community-driven design of a polywell reactor.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Aero
Posts: 1200
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:36 am
Location: 92111

Post by Aero »

So if WB-8.1 generates 100 mW of fusion poser, that will be good enough for the navy to proceed with funding for the construction of WB-9. Hopefully it will be more power, but as long as it is enough to justify project continuation, then I will be happy. Well, as long as the justification is based on firmly valid results. Of course we'd all be happier if we could see some of those results. I doubt any of us wants to see continued funding for a failed effort. As my daddy would have said, it does no good to beat a dead horse.
Aero

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

Aero wrote:So if WB-8.1 generates 100 mW of fusion poser, that will be good enough for the navy to proceed with funding for the construction of WB-9. Hopefully it will be more power, but as long as it is enough to justify project continuation, then I will be happy. Well, as long as the justification is based on firmly valid results. Of course we'd all be happier if we could see some of those results. I doubt any of us wants to see continued funding for a failed effort. As my daddy would have said, it does no good to beat a dead horse.
The deal about 100mW is not the power. It is the fact that with that many fusions diagnostics start to get reliable (not confounded so much by statistical fluctuations).
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

TallDave
Posts: 3140
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Contact:

Post by TallDave »

MSimon wrote:My take is that 100 mW does not represent net power. Just the amount of fusion.
Sorry, I just don't see how that's possible.
3.2.2 The contractor shall deliver a report detailing the results of the experimental testing of WB8.1. The report shall provide sufficient information to guide programmatic and design decisions about further, refined design efforts for similar devices. The report shall address the plasma dynamics of WB devices, and shall address the scaling laws
that apply to polywell fusion, and the feasibility of the PB11 reaction. The report shall address the conceptual requirements for a polywell fusion reactor capable of generating approximately 100mW.
That graf just doesnt make sense read as milliwatts. WB-8 itself should produce at least 80 times that, and nothing that makes only 100 milliwatts should be called a "reactor," nor would we need to consider the conceptual requirements.

Has to be a typo, imo.
Last edited by TallDave on Thu Sep 24, 2009 3:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

TallDave
Posts: 3140
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Contact:

Post by TallDave »

So if WB-8.1 generates 100 mW of fusion poser, that will be good enough for the navy to proceed with funding for the construction of WB-9.
No, that's definitely not what the SOW says. The only place "mw" appears is in the reference to a conceptual design of a future reactor.

https://www.neco.navy.mil/upload/N68936 ... R-0044.pdf

Post Reply