Page 1 of 1

Radiation Shielding Materials Containing H, B, and N

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 4:05 pm
by DeltaV

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 11:37 pm
by Endersworld
Why don't we just spatter transfer the interior walls with tungsten, its a fairly good neutron reflector and temperature resistant.

Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 5:01 am
by DeltaV
The problem may be gammas, more than neutrons, for p-11B.

Need suppressed Navy data to be sure.

Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 5:09 am
by Endersworld
so the gammas are basicly high energy xrays, or hard xrays, a surface with high enough density should be capable of deflecting them, a multi layer system would probably eliminate all of it. xrays have enough trouble going through hardened steel.

Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 5:58 am
by D Tibbets
Penetration of gamma rays depends on it's energy. Steel will stop 50,000 eV gammas or x-rays with only thin layers. A million eV gamma is a different story. Lead, tungsten or uranium would do better per thickness, unit of weitht, but the number of gammas to absorb where perhaps 1 part in 10,000 to 50,000 of the fusion energy is huge. In a 100 Megawatt output, that would be
~ 2,000 Watts of gamma energy. That is enough to quickly fry anybody near a non shielded machine. Without looking it up , I think a few second exposure may be lethal.

Dan Tibbets

Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 8:57 pm
by 93143
I calculated somewhere that for a reactor to be safe to work near for long periods, you'd want roughly a foot of lead shielding. These gammas are 4, 12, and 16 MeV, occurring due to gamma decay of excited ¹²C (excess energy of 16 MeV) once in every ~10,000 p-¹¹B reactions.

This is not a particularly well-documented reaction branch, though, and it's possible (if unlikely) that it won't turn out to be a problem...

Re: Radiation Shielding Materials Containing H, B, and N

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 3:53 pm
I've been fiddling with data from Wikipedia on p11B fusion, which suggests that the side reaction

p+11B->12C+Gamma (16MeV) occurs with a 0.1 % branching probability.

Given this, I think a 10MW (Th) reactor would be a source of kilowatts of 16MeV gammas, and I agree with the last post that a foot of lead is about what is needed to stay healthy a couple of metres from such a thing.

However, there is no definitive reference, and looking at tables of excited states 12C* I can't see such a decay mentioned.

Does anyone have a definitive reference, or a suggestion where to search for such a thing?

As far as I can see this is very important to any p11B system.

Re: Radiation Shielding Materials Containing H, B, and N

Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:33 pm
I found this, seems to corroborate the above, around page 65 onwards ... 090626.pdf