Let us start discrediting tokamak fusion. Wrong Shape.

Discuss ways to make polywell research more widely known or better understood. Includes education and outreach.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois

Postby MSimon » Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:28 pm

TallDave wrote:
jmc wrote:They keep finding more problems, so I have to doubt a continously operating net power plant can be close to ITER-sized without some radical advances. It would not surprise me if they come back and say it needs to be 2-4x larger.

2X to 4X bigger has been the tokamak rallying cry for 50 years.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Posts: 427
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 9:16 am
Location: Ireland

Postby jmc » Sat Mar 29, 2008 3:10 pm

You can get away with a smaller tokamak with high energy densities and net energy production if you increase the field strength aswell, I think that was what the FIRE programme was about, building a reactor the size of JET only running it at 10 Tesla instead of three.


The only catch is morepowerful magnetic fields also cost money.

Return to “Awareness”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest