Page 2 of 2

Re: "Missing Heat" Finally Found: It's In the Arctic

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 10:41 pm
by Schneibster
MSimon wrote:S,

For 2013 your chart shows data within the normal range. What exactly are you trying to do? Corroborate the information (which has more months in 2013) I posted?

Or are you hoping I'll only look at 2012?
Hmmm, maybe I'm misinterpreting this. You saw the years on the outsides of that spiral, right?

Do you see anything going up in that spiral? If so, what did you take and how many?

What "normal range?" You mean "normal expected permanent decline thatwereallypromiseisn'treallyglobalwarminglookatthisshinyobjectoverhere?"

Yeah, I looked twice, there's no other "chart."

Umm, the data goes back to like 1980 or something. Every year a little lower. Now it's almost zero.

You're really not all that great at math and charts and graphs and stuff, are you?

Re: "Missing Heat" Finally Found: It's In the Arctic

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 11:03 pm
by hanelyp
This infilling of data reminds me of extrapolating a clear identifiable picture from a few pixels of an image. A fantasy.

Re: "Missing Heat" Finally Found: It's In the Arctic

Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 11:08 pm
by Schneibster
What "infilling of data?"