Re: Popular Science Comments Closed Forever
Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 4:28 am
I don't see any point in exchanging views with someone who is wrong fourteen thousand to twenty five. It seems like talking to an idiot.
a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
https://talk-polywell.org/bb/
No, they could count.GIThruster wrote:That's pretty much what the Nazis said as they marched the Jews off to gas chambers.
GIThruster wrote:As dopey as the guy may be, we all know we can stand some disagreement here. What I object to is the adolescent self-righteerousness and progressive intent that he seems to think quenching dissenting voices is the way to proceed in civil discussion. He sounds like a Nazi.
And you know, this is the biggest problem with the AGW movement: it was never pursued as a scientific discussion. It went straight from unfounded adolescent diatribe to political action without any real discussion. If you'll recall, the first dissenters concerning AGW were a group from Japan who rightly showed the science was laughable (and in fact they laughed about the "silly Americans who can't do math"). Yet Al Gore pushed this in the political arena and we have the trouble we have. Boatloads of scientists signed up to support the AGW and now renamed (because there was no evidence of anthropic cause) Climate Change, with no tools to know how to even look at the situation. We've had now not one but two, international scandals where scientists were definitively shown to have falsified their data to support the political stance of Climate Change and yet, no one looses their teaching position, and society still puts out drones like this guy above.
Sad that science is so easily thrown under the bus.
Schneibster wrote:I don't see any point in exchanging views with someone who is wrong fourteen thousand to twenty five. It seems like talking to an idiot.
Schneibster wrote:Telling you anti-scientific "theories" (actually none of them are actually any better than conjectures, and falsified ones at that) are false is not "Nazi." It's "science."GIThruster wrote:As dopey as the guy may be, we all know we can stand some disagreement here. What I object to is the adolescent self-righteerousness and progressive intent that he seems to think quenching dissenting voices is the way to proceed in civil discussion. He sounds like a Nazi.
Wake up.
Diogenes I'm already familiar with. I don't waste my time on posers.
Dude when you're lusing 14000 to 25 I really have to say you look like a nutjob. If it's 50-50 you have an argument; when it's 560-1 you're pretty much holding the short end of the stick. Get over it.
GIThruster wrote:Only they're not "anti-scientific views". They're objections to a pseudo-scientific view there is to date NO EVIDENCE FOR.
You want to close down discussion, because you are too feeble minded to actually have an intelligent discussion of these matters.
Just like the progressives who supported eugenics and the slaughter of the jews.
You're a Nazi. Wake up.
Schneibster wrote:Look, it's really simple, they're geophysicists and you're not.
Get
over
it.
Fourteen thousand to twenty five. What do you need, jebus to come down from a hole in the sky and confirm it?
The shock is not that some people think like that, but that enough people with enough resources to make those videos think that way, and are so politically tone deaf and isolated that they didn't realize how it reflected on them until after the videos were made.Diogenes wrote:Do you not remember that violent 10:10 Campaign advertisement in which those Global Warming kooks wanted to KILL everyone who doubted their new religion? The Teacher presses a button and blows kids heads off.
Truth is not democratic and unlike you I have no dog or "e-peen" in this fight. If "climate deniers" are zealots you are still beyond fanatic compared to me.Schneibster wrote:Fourteen thousand to twenty five looks like pretty good reasoning to me. It seems what you want me to do is pretend I'm wrong when you lost fourteen thousand to twenty five.Betruger wrote:Indeed this is basically unmoderated. For sure you're going nowhere fast if you can't argue or can't temper your passions with reason.
I think you need medication for your obsession. Or else you can't count.
Fourteen thousand to twenty five isn't democratic. It's overwhelming and you're wrong, period. Get over it. If you can't get over it get medication so you don't wreck your life worrying about it; folks who know way way more have it all under control.
I was over it the instant politics and their actors (e.g. you) showed up. Years ago. I don't waste, I consume efficiently, I try and influence friends and acquaintances towards same. I even keep relationships unpolluted - I don't pontificate.If you can't get over it get medication so you don't wreck your life worrying about it
Haha! Well now... You don't say?folks who know way way more have it all under control.
That subtlety's blurred to irrelevance in his bias.. This guy must be straight outta some partisan ghetto like daily kos or whatever. It's like he took a wrong exit to T-P from some youtube comment thread.GIThruster wrote:Second I'd note to you that Betruger is ENTIRELY CORRECT when he notes that truth is NOT the result of a vote.
There's no point in arguing with people who just lie.choff wrote:Basically, the computer models that predicted warming are all dropping like dead flies, so now the banksters trying to stick us with carbon taxes are resorting to the big lie as a last gasp. I remember the claim that the Greenland Vikings had to keep the cattle in the barn 7 months of the year because it was too cold for them. The fun thing about that claim was that the growing season required to provide for a years fodder would have been considerably less that 5 months and even hotter than accepted. That or even more land under cultivation than a small community could work using middle age methods.