Rinos Trying to Force A Third Bush

[mvanwink5]

These numbskulls pushed Romney last election, now, somehow, these guys in their great delusion think that a repackaged Bush is just the thing (taking a page from Gruber).
So, what else is new?
The Democan communist wing has their own woes, Hillary is campaigning with ruby slippers trying to dodge houses, so the Coms are pulling out the big wampum wearing a full native Am indian feathered headdress. Yes, how can we forget... what's her name? Oh, yeah Eliz Chavez Warren. Miss Venzuela, is championing the 99% against Banksters...right. Slogans-n-Socialism go together like Soup-n-Sandwich, just the ticket, an Obumbster replacement.

So, Bushies think even a retread Firestone can be sold to the Gruber-public when faced with the 'Peoples' champion Wampum Warren (thinking Hillary can't dodge houses as she is so old).

Cynics, all of them. But they can't afford to let a 'loose cannon' run, Neocons and Neocoms are united in that one understanding. And the old court conman, Trump, will try to get some free publicity for his old show... what's it called?

What a joke on us.

[MSimon]

Yeah. What a joke. On us.

But there is change in the pipeline. The public is not to happy with rules made far away. The trend is towards smaller and more local government.

One of the bigger problems I see is that the two political philosophies do not understand that they need each other. They are suited to different ecological niches. Each “side” thinks they have all the answers and should dominate. It is not only wrong. It is stupid. National and even State politics needs to be cut way back. The best politics IMO is local. For a LOT of reasons.

A thermodynamic explanation of politics

I wrote that in late 2009.

Our #1 problem is that we were taught the wrong stuff in school. The r/K article (and others like it) needs to be taught. The thermodynamics of politics needs to be taught. Instead we get Capitalism vs Socialism. Not a bad analysis for the 20th Century. Useless for the 21st.

[mvanwink5]

No, we are taught total Socialism vs a bit less Socialism, and that masters are needed for the Gruber serfs. The illusion that total Socialism has a chance is created by economies totally supported by pumping oil out of the ground and selling it to countries in rapid decline due to the Progressive march to more 'Utopian' Socialism.

[MSimon]

My co-blogger wrote this:

http://classicalvalues.com/2014/12/just ... ther-bush/

and the comments here are almost universally negative

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christiner ... n-n1932534

[Stubby]

If North Korea can have a 3rd Kim, what could go wrong with a 3rd Bush?

[DeltaV]

BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP!

Your attention, please!

In order to maximize the efficiency and predictability of the electoral process in our free society, it has been decided that,
from now on, all odd-numbered Presidents will be named Bush and all even-numbered Presidents will be named Clinton.

This will not only conserve taxpayer dollars, but will increase confidence in computer simulations of Presidential election outcomes to the 5 sigma level.

Thank you for your cooperation.

That is all.

[paperburn1]

I read it on the internet it must be true!

[djolds1]

These numbskulls pushed Romney last election, now, somehow, these guys in their great delusion think that a repackaged Bush is just the thing (taking a page from Gruber).
So, what else is new?
The Democan communist wing has their own woes, Hillary is campaigning with ruby slippers trying to dodge houses, so the Coms are pulling out the big wampum wearing a full native Am indian feathered headdress. Yes, how can we forget... what's her name? Oh, yeah Eliz Chavez Warren. Miss Venzuela, is championing the 99% against Banksters...right. Slogans-n-Socialism go together like Soup-n-Sandwich, just the ticket, an Obumbster replacement.

So, Bushies think even a retread Firestone can be sold to the Gruber-public when faced with the 'Peoples' champion Wampum Warren (thinking Hillary can't dodge houses as she is so old).

Cynics, all of them. But they can't afford to let a 'loose cannon' run, Neocons and Neocoms are united in that one understanding. And the old court conman, Trump, will try to get some free publicity for his old show... what's it called?

What a joke on us.

Bush the Holy Ghost???

*GROAN*

I expect four or five GOPher candidates in 2016. Three Establishment choices (as of now I'd bet on Christie, Rubio and Bush the Holy Spirit), Paul because he has his own organization and funding but wants actual power unlike daddy, and maybe one Dark Horse - Walker, Haley, etc. I expect the Establishment to force out most fringe candidates much as they did in the Senate races this year.

[GIThruster]

A new answer to the RINOs?

http://dailysignal.com/2015/01/15/conse ... ium=social

[MSimon]

A new answer to the RINOs?

http://dailysignal.com/2015/01/15/conse ... ium=social

Well they are going to get a lot of grief from the 49 or so libertarian Republicans.

http://classicalvalues.com/2015/01/dc-pot/ Let me repost just part of my analysis:

This is re: cannabis legalization in DC.

The libertarian faction of the Republicans is 49 votes. The Democrats won’t vote for it <stopping DC from legalizing>. And a lot of Republicans would rather it didn’t become an election issue in 2016.

My guess is that the R leadership will not let it come up for a vote for fear of a loss which would weaken the Rs. They know they are losing on the issue and would rather not make that obvious.

http://lims.dccouncil.us/Download/33216 ... uction.pdf

DC is also introducing a tax and regulate cannabis measure <see link immediately above> which Congress will either ignore (it passes) or they will have to try to get enough votes to veto it. Same problem. The 49 libertarians.

[GIThruster]

More evidence of your delusion, Simon. Just FYI, no one believes your preposterous numbers. Not even close. And no, you are not worth taking seriously enough to even answer at this point. You need to stop LYING to people. It's like when a 2 year old lies to the adults, and we're too embarrassed to let the kiddy know we're in on the scam. . .druggies are that stupid as you well attest to.

[MSimon]

More evidence of your delusion, Simon. Just FYI, no one believes your preposterous numbers. Not even close. And no, you are not worth taking seriously enough to even answer at this point. You need to stop LYING to people. It's like when a 2 year old lies to the adults, and we're too embarrassed to let the kiddy know we're in on the scam. . .druggies are that stupid as you well attest to.

Funny thing. The Washington Post came up with the same analysis (without numbers). I had made my analysis before I saw the WaPo. Let me quote them.

D.C. Democrats say they are ready to wager that Republicans will be unwilling to get bogged down in overturning the city’s marijuana law, which 7 in 10 voters supported in last month’s election. Doing so, Republican strategists acknowledge, risks exposing a divide between Republican conservatives and libertarians that could prove consequential to the 2016 presidential race.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc- ... story.html

You will note "Republican strategists".

We will know in about 30 days who is delusional. I'll be sure to do a post on it either way. Just so you know.