An excursion in speculative physics

Discuss life, the universe, and everything with other members of this site. Get to know your fellow polywell enthusiasts.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
hanelyp
Posts: 2261
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:50 pm

An excursion in speculative physics

Post by hanelyp »

Let us propose a "gravity frame", defined in the Newtonian limit by

Code: Select all

V = sum(mass * V(m) / R^2) / sum(V(m) / R^2)
where:
V = velocity of the gravity frame
mass = mass increment
V(m) = velocity of above mass
R = radius from point of interest to mass

Let us further postulate that the speed of light is constant relative to the gravity frame.

Observations:

The gravity frame tends to have a low velocity relative to a laboratory fixed to the surface of a planet, and variation in gravity frame velocity even less. This makes effects of gravity frame velocity difficult to observe. But non-zero and thus observable to a sufficiently sensitive experiment. Of significance, certain experiments which fail conservation of energy in a relativistic universe may conserve energy if the gravity frame holds.

Running numeric calculations based on the above hypothesis and Preliminary Reference Earth Model (PREM) (Dziewonski & Anderson, 1981) for distribution of mass throughout the Earth, I find the gravity frame to move at roughly 200m/s relative to a point fixed on the equator. Referencing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson ... experiment I find 3 experiments listed with both sufficient sensitivity and clear sensitivity to the right kind of effect to note the gravity frame if this hypothesis is valid. Hypothesis busted.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.

Post Reply