Talk-Polywell.org

a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 8:40 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Plasma Wall Interactions
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Posts: 12567
Location: Rockford, Illinois
http://www.ecnmag.com/News/2011/09/Air- ... eractions/

Quote:
Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology and the University of Alabama have received a $2.5 million grant from the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) to conduct fundamental research into the ways in which plasmas interact with the walls of the structures containing them. The research will also examine potential improvements to materials used for the walls.

_________________
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Posts: 5634
Location: Northern VA
hypersonic missile heat shields?
Hypersonic AIRCRAFT heat shields?

_________________
Dan,
Do the numbers... correctly, "think Hydrogen".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:54 am
Posts: 1871
Quote:
research into the ways in which plasmas interact with the walls of the structures containing them


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:27 pm
Posts: 1009
just your basic nuclear materials testing. probably for increasing the expected lifespan of a tokamak - a major limiting factor in the economic feasibility.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Test_Reactor


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 960
... when you've given up trying to 'contain' plasma any other way... :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:27 pm
Posts: 1009
rcain wrote:
... when you've given up trying to 'contain' plasma any other way... :evil:


lol. if you can't keep the pot from melting, just buy a new one every meal, right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 960
happyjack27 wrote:
rcain wrote:
... when you've given up trying to 'contain' plasma any other way... :evil:


lol. if you can't keep the pot from melting, just buy a new one every meal, right?


perhaps a very thick pot. sacrificial, or reformed/recycled somehow. electrochemically perhaps.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 5:56 pm
Posts: 203
Location: Southeast US
I wonder if someone could convince to Doctors in charge to use a polywell for the plasma instead of a tokamak? Less capacitors? More likely to receive positive press from Alan Boyle, for example?

Persuade the scientist to use small polywells for more testing purposes....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 960
@bennmann - very good suggestion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:52 am
Posts: 2076
rcain wrote:
happyjack27 wrote:
rcain wrote:
... when you've given up trying to 'contain' plasma any other way... :evil:


lol. if you can't keep the pot from melting, just buy a new one every meal, right?


perhaps a very thick pot. sacrificial, or reformed/recycled somehow. electrochemically perhaps.


Precisely. At least for the NIF. IF they push to a power producing pulsed laser system and stick with gold horboliums (sp?), they will be vaporizing and to a small extent transmuting ~ a BB sized chunk of gold at up to perhaps a hundred shots per second. This may approximate ~ 1 once of gold per second, or almost $2,000 per second, $ 120,000 per minute or almost $3,000,000 per hr in gold consumption alone. How much of this can be recovered. How much will be deposited on the vessel walls. Removing it will require concentrated nitric acid which will not be kind to the underlieing metal, unless some other clever mechanism can be used. Without high efficiency recycling a couple of plants might burn through the entire worlds gold supply in only a few years. The only substitute high density metal that I speculate might work at lower cost and greater abundance might be lead, silver, tin, tungsten, or even mercury. Uranium , and thorium would have induced radiation problems, Could the system be made to work with a lighter metal such as aluminum, iron, nickel or copper? Osmium or platinum would cost even more than the gold.

Dan Tibbets

_________________
To error is human... and I'm very human.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 12:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:04 pm
Posts: 832
Location: Summerville SC, USA
.
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 5:19 pm

rjaypeters wrote:
horboliums => Hohlraum?

Dan, Did you write "horboliums" just to get me to respond? :) You are consistent in your humanity, I must say.

Say it after me: "Hole Rowm". Now say it again. Write it a few times, just for fun... :wink:

http://www.talk-polywell.org/bb/viewtop ... 61&start=0

_________________
So...it has come to this.

R. Peters


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 12:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm
Posts: 4526
Quote:
Precisely. At least for the NIF. IF they push to a power producing pulsed laser system and stick with gold horboliums (sp?), they will be vaporizing and to a small extent transmuting ~ a BB sized chunk of gold at up to perhaps a hundred shots per second. This may approximate ~ 1 once of gold per second, or almost $2,000 per second, $ 120,000 per minute or almost $3,000,000 per hr in gold consumption alone. How much of this can be recovered. How much will be deposited on the vessel walls. Removing it will require concentrated nitric acid which will not be kind to the underlieing metal, unless some other clever mechanism can be used. Without high efficiency recycling a couple of plants might burn through the entire worlds gold supply in only a few years. The only substitute high density metal that I speculate might work at lower cost and greater abundance might be lead, silver, tin, tungsten, or even mercury. Uranium , and thorium would have induced radiation problems, Could the system be made to work with a lighter metal such as aluminum, iron, nickel or copper? Osmium or platinum would cost even more than the gold.

Exactly my view of the situations as well. It is an absolutely ridiculous concept. If you ask me, it is all about the weapons applications of this, not about any serious research into fusion energy. That is just a means to sell it to the gullible public, so they keep the dollars flowing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:50 pm
Posts: 1113
Quote:
gold horboliums (sp?)

Horriblums? :wink: Vaporizing umpteen precision made pieces for a power reactor strikes me as a horrible idea. The gold should be mostly recoverable. The machining costs would eat you alive.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 12:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:27 pm
Posts: 1009
...like i said: not economically viable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:05 pm
Posts: 5634
Location: Northern VA
hanelyp wrote:
Quote:
gold horboliums (sp?)

Horriblums? :wink: Vaporizing umpteen precision made pieces for a power reactor strikes me as a horrible idea. The gold should be mostly recoverable. The machining costs would eat you alive.
A BLOOMING horrible idea. Horriblooms!

_________________
Dan,
Do the numbers... correctly, "think Hydrogen".


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group