Talk-Polywell.org

a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 8:50 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:05 am
Posts: 1613
NIAC 2012 Spring Symposium Agenda


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm
Posts: 4536
I saw it. I really wished i could go there. Tuesday will see presentations on some very interesting research in regards to propulsion, some on nuclear and fusion propulsion too.
I am very curious to see if Slough has anything new to show. He has recently received a NASA grant to further his research, so there is hope he already has some new results.
I hope they record the whole thing and put it online.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 3:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:05 am
Posts: 1613
http://www.nasa.gov/offices/oct/early_s ... tions.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 5:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm
Posts: 4536
cool, thanks.
I saw some of the presentation materials on NBF a while ago. The PDF is definitely welcome though. Wished they had recorded the presentation on video. That would be cool too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 564
For those who haven't bothered to read MSNW's presentation, you might find these quotes fairly interesting:

Quote:
Design of the FDR Breakeven Proof of Concept Experiment

Quote:
PHD experiment with some of the 1.75 MJ, ±25 kV
capacitor modules shown in the foreground.

• More than sufficient bank energy for G~1 experiment
• Equipment becomes available in July 2012

Quote:
Anticipated Parameters from FDR Validation Experiment
...
• Final FRC parameters yield a fusion gain G = 1.6 (MsubL=0.18 kg Al)

Quote:
"Experimental demonstration of fusion gain with inductively driven metal liners" — Hope to publish in the near future!

He's not being very subtle, is he?

I'm not sure why he uses G instead of Q.

_________________
“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.” —attr. to Andy Finkel, among others


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:05 am
Posts: 1613
Ivy Matt wrote:
I'm not sure why he uses G instead of Q.

G(ain) is more relevant for energy calculations. Q(uality factor) is more relevant for resonant systems, which I don't think FRC is.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group