EMC2 news

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

mvanwink5
Posts: 1809
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Re: EMC2 news

Post by mvanwink5 »

Interview is a great find; it is 11 months since it was put on Youtube so we could be near an update. From the interview, given a year has passed, it sounds like EMC2 is near or 1 year away from having a model that will simulate a working machine that will say 'it should work' or 'it won't work.'

This has been a long wait for many here, what's another year. LOL!
Near term, cheap, dark horse fusion hits the air waves, GF - TED, LM - Announcement. The race is on.

windmill
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:19 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: EMC2 news

Post by windmill »

So, correct me if I'm wrong, but reading the new patent, Polywell now: 1) does not need an electron-beam-injected potential well to operate, 2) requires a 2.5 meter radius core to generate just 90MW of fusion power even with D-T, and 3) has even less of a chance than before of burning aneutronic fuels with a decent fusion Q.

Giorgio
Posts: 2737
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: China, Italy

Re: EMC2 news

Post by Giorgio »

windmill wrote:So, correct me if I'm wrong, but reading the new patent, Polywell now: 1) does not need an electron-beam-injected potential well to operate, 2) requires a 2.5 meter radius core to generate just 90MW of fusion power even with D-T, and 3) has even less of a chance than before of burning aneutronic fuels with a decent fusion Q.
If memory serves me right the first two of those assumptions was based on the results from WB-8, the High beta cusp device and some simulations. Everything should have been further validated/investigated in the proof of principle reactor that didn't get funded till now.
Considering the lack of a broader scientific experimental database, even if the latest experimental run they made did indeed show a glimpse of a promising situation (especially when they was shooting at higher power), I would suggest you to consider the first 2 points with a grain of salt.
The third point was just the result of a numerical simulation, I would not consider it meaningful until there is some scientific data to support it.
A society of dogmas is a dead society.

hanelyp
Posts: 2255
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:50 pm

Re: EMC2 news

Post by hanelyp »

By my recollection, the potential well was vital to the favorable energy distribution, ion vs electron, for aneutronic fuels. I also recall speculation that a well could be created without electron injection by differential leakage through the cusps. Of course then you need some other means of heating the plasma.
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.

Giorgio
Posts: 2737
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: China, Italy

Re: EMC2 news

Post by Giorgio »

I remember that those was all points supposed to be investigated into the "Proof of Principle" reactor.
1) Verifying and characterizing the Wiffleball properties, ion circulation and magnetic line configuration at the (partially or totally closed) cusps
2) Verifying and characterizing the behavior of a sustained time high Beta operation and the transition mechanism to the high Beta stable state.
3) Demonstrating ion heating by e-beam injection in different high Beta configurations.

A real pity that they didn't find any financing until now, there seems to be lot of new plasma behavior to be investigated and it really got me pretty excited the first time I saw Park paper.
A society of dogmas is a dead society.

Tom Ligon
Posts: 1871
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:23 am
Location: Northern Virginia
Contact:

Re: EMC2 news

Post by Tom Ligon »

paperburn1 wrote:Notably hidden among the budget items for NASA was a $100 million allocation to develop a nuclear thermal rockets.
Does anybody know if polywell tried to get their fingers into that rice bowl?
This comes up from time to time. When we were working in Manassas Park there was an initiative within NASA (with no outside news that I've ever seen) for "Strategy F". This was a push I think from Huntsville to develop either fission or fusion to reach Mars with crewed spacecraft. Dr. Bussard suspected it was intended to give Huntsville a mission (in other words, funding, and continuation of employment).

The three Fs were fission (NERVA or something like it), fusion using tokamaks, and fusion using the Polywell. Thus, two of the three F's were from Dr. Bussard's ideas. He was greatly amused. But evidently this particular idea never got much beyond a memo. He was contacted by someone seeking a proposal, but they had no money, and he'd written multiple papers proposing just this already.

There was, of course, a push in NASA to use VASIMIR, a motor in need of a power source, and there was good reason for any Mars strategy to at least consider if that system could be incorporated. It would be compatible with Polywell powerplants. It could also use fission, but not in the form of NERVA.

Of the strategies available in the late 90's when this was floated, nuclear-thermal was the most proven, with working engines tested and stored under a mountain in Nevada.

daveklingler
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:42 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

Re: EMC2 news

Post by daveklingler »

I'm curious to know whether anyone has whether EMC2 is participating in DoE's cost-sharing private/public partnership program. It seems like a good opportunity to push things a little further along. Any news from Park in general?

https://www.federalregister.gov/documen ... ion-energy

zbarlici
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:23 am
Location: winnipeg, canada

Re: EMC2 news

Post by zbarlici »

daveklingler wrote:
Tue May 19, 2020 1:48 am
I'm curious to know whether anyone has whether EMC2 is participating in DoE's cost-sharing private/public partnership program. It seems like a good opportunity to push things a little further along. Any news from Park in general?

https://www.federalregister.gov/documen ... ion-energy
...imagine that IEC or some other non-tokamac fusion approach becomes the next step to the future, & the DOE sits there afterwards looking like the complete fool that it is, for not having diversified its funding to approaches beyond the mega-sloth that is the tokamac.

daveklingler
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:42 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

Re: EMC2 news

Post by daveklingler »

Just noticed a paper by Dr. Park, published back in December.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 00074/full

bennmann
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 5:56 pm
Location: Southeast US

Re: EMC2 news

Post by bennmann »

daveklingler wrote:
Sat Jun 27, 2020 11:50 pm
Just noticed a paper by Dr. Park, published back in December.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 00074/full
Figure 1 looks like inspiration for the Skunk Works Compact Fusion Reactor

crowberry
Posts: 516
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:34 am

Re: EMC2 news

Post by crowberry »

Munchausen wrote:
Sun Jan 27, 2019 6:39 pm
Article submitted 23/1 this year:

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1901/1901.08041.pdf

https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.08041
The article from December 2019 is the journal published version of the preprint published in January 2019. The results are quite interesting.

Giorgio
Posts: 2737
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: China, Italy

Re: EMC2 news

Post by Giorgio »

This paper is mainly derived from the work done in the publication of the last patent. There was indeed several intriguing ideas and proposal in that patent, unfortunately it was only a theoretical framework model and they never actually tested in a real machine.
A society of dogmas is a dead society.

paperburn1
Posts: 2458
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
Location: Third rock from the sun.

Re: EMC2 news

Post by paperburn1 »

Nuclear Operations Group at BWXT, a company that is making “tristructural isotropic” fuel . I think this might spell the death song of any high dollar small fusion research/
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.

Giorgio
Posts: 2737
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: China, Italy

Re: EMC2 news

Post by Giorgio »

paperburn1 wrote:
Wed Jul 01, 2020 1:35 pm
Nuclear Operations Group at BWXT, a company that is making “tristructural isotropic” fuel . I think this might spell the death song of any high dollar small fusion research/
Pebble bed fission reactors have indeed an inherent advantage in safety in respect to traditional fission reactors, but they are still "traditional" fission reactors, with all the annexed limits
I don't really see how this could spell the end of any type of Fusion research.
A society of dogmas is a dead society.

Post Reply