Search found 334 matches
- Mon Jun 15, 2009 7:10 pm
- Forum: Implications
- Topic: Rockets!
- Replies: 48
- Views: 47686
Does reverse osmosis reduce the D fraction? By how much? RO should not touch the isotope distribution. It is purely physical chemistry. (I work with RO water purifiers these days.) Even a Palladium hydrogen purifier which makes 99.999995% pure hydrogen sees D pretty much the same as H. Remember the...
- Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:51 pm
- Forum: Design
- Topic: Is There an Optimal Size for Magrid Casings?
- Replies: 339
- Views: 172978
Work in Progress with some actual progress to show. Size of space modeled in meters: X=-0.50 to +0.50 Y=-0.70 to +0.70 Z=-0.50 to +0.50 Origin: at the polyhedron’s vertex. Coil parts modeled are Kiteman’s X-Cusp laid out on a plane i.e. not yet bent around the sphere. This is using Kiteman’s spreads...
- Tue Jun 09, 2009 4:22 am
- Forum: Design
- Topic: A question about higher order polyhedra.
- Replies: 153
- Views: 64809
- Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:49 pm
- Forum: Design
- Topic: Is There an Optimal Size for Magrid Casings?
- Replies: 339
- Views: 172978
My latest understanding is that with pBj the heat loading is about zero EXCELLENT! :D :D :D Yes, that was good news. Eight inches is probably a good start I just did the calcs with 0.100 meter radius coil casings which is 8 inches diameter. (It really should not affect what I just did but it is goo...
- Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:58 am
- Forum: Design
- Topic: Is There an Optimal Size for Magrid Casings?
- Replies: 339
- Views: 172978
distance of the field point relative to the mid-point of the line segment, not the distance normal to the line segment. good point If the bead density is high enough it should show where it is well enough. I may yet have to draw the coil wire explicitly from the wire path segment list. If so, so be...
- Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:26 pm
- Forum: Design
- Topic: Is There an Optimal Size for Magrid Casings?
- Replies: 339
- Views: 172978
I caused mine to fall to 0 based on the amount of current still inside the location. This avoids the edge singularity your way produces (if I understand your way). I don't really care about the field inside the conductor. My only concern is the field in the plasma region. The singularity is a real ...
- Tue Jun 02, 2009 12:53 pm
- Forum: Design
- Topic: Is There an Optimal Size for Magrid Casings?
- Replies: 339
- Views: 172978
That is what I thought you were trying to get at, but I was not sure. By inputting the minor radius, the current gets reduced by the ratio of your standoff from centerline within the coil divided by the minor radius, quantity squared. Clear? No, not exactly clear yet. The radius of the conductor or ...
- Tue Jun 02, 2009 12:14 pm
- Forum: Design
- Topic: A question about higher order polyhedra.
- Replies: 153
- Views: 64809
IMO the structural loads get better with higher order polyhedra. Consider the limiting case of a plane of coils. The forces all balance out and there is no net mechanical load on the coils. Near the limiting case with each coil covering a small solid angle (as seen from the center of the PW) there i...
- Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:01 am
- Forum: Design
- Topic: Is There an Optimal Size for Magrid Casings?
- Replies: 339
- Views: 172978
This is still just a random shot of work in progress I'm not really happy with it yet, although it is getting almost useful. The z axis is very foreshortened from this viewing angle. That angle is to show all the field direction/strength lines between the balls. And besides at least one of the axes ...
- Sun May 31, 2009 9:24 am
- Forum: Design
- Topic: Is There an Optimal Size for Magrid Casings?
- Replies: 339
- Views: 172978
http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm317/tombo1234/Drawing4-Model.jpg It seems to have gotten fuzzified during conversion to jpeg to photobucket to here. Again ball dia and line length are proportional to field strength and line direction is field direction. The scale is Teslas with an adjustment t...
- Tue May 26, 2009 6:03 am
- Forum: Design
- Topic: Is There an Optimal Size for Magrid Casings?
- Replies: 339
- Views: 172978
O52, Q52, and R521 are the summed Bx, By, and Bz respectively. Yes that is what I meant. These are where I am taking your output as my input to run with. O51 superposes the “x” field of the modeled side coil with that of the “other” (unmodeled) side while O53 does the same for the modeled top and t...
- Mon May 25, 2009 10:34 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: We Will Know In Two Years
- Replies: 158
- Views: 92883
- Mon May 25, 2009 10:21 am
- Forum: Design
- Topic: Is There an Optimal Size for Magrid Casings?
- Replies: 339
- Views: 172978
http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm317/tombo1234/vect.jpg This porcupine is a snapshot of a work in progress so please don't be too harsh in your judgment. It has been so long since I contributed that I wanted to get something showing. I started with Kiteman's spreadsheet, tore my hair out trying...
- Sat May 23, 2009 3:19 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: We Will Know In Two Years
- Replies: 158
- Views: 92883
- Sat May 23, 2009 3:09 am
- Forum: Design
- Topic: A question about higher order polyhedra.
- Replies: 153
- Views: 64809
Remember a coil failure with WB-6 almost killed the project. This is exactly why we need multiple experiments. The larger machine will need a larger building, power supplies, vacuum pumps, generators, etc. all of which are long lead items. The second (larger) machine will be far enough behind the f...