Talk-Polywell.org

Regarding the gloating over climate gate, seems like there are errors on both sides of this argument folks: Solar magnetic activity (sun spots) and cosmic rays. http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers/DamonLaut2004.pdf http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers...

How do you justify that as not a problem. Easy. No one actually knows for sure if it's a problem. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_acidification It might even be a net benefit to ocean life. A lot of people don't seem to realize the oceans aren't becoming acidic, they're becoming less alkaline. A...

You need proof of environmental change by humans? Hmm, How about CO2 causing acidification of the ocean and its consequence. How do you justify that as not a problem. What is wrong with taking on a moral decision? No one is accusing you of a lack of that, just reminding you, in a most respectful way...

Please provide that documentation and references. Real science and not the hockey stick crap. I'm tired of having to do heavy lifting to prove my points while all you provide are airy moralizations. I've got the stuff to backup what I say. Do you? The top ten reasons to hate the AGW cabal http://ww...

Ironic the worse producer of GHG, coal produces CO2 at 2tons/kwh compared to 1.3tons/kwh of natural gas use could be stupidly used to help itself. Yet, I'm not sure I would use one of its pollutants to counter another one of its pollutants. But hey, some one with vested interest in coal more than li...

Please explain to me why the odd holocene stability which is lasting longer than other interglacials? Why are we not on the typical short duration and temperature decline of other past interglacials? How the hell is man made CO2 responsible for the current length of the interglacial? Msimon pointed...

More importantly, would be to stop building coal burning plants until we solve the problem which is an important step to solving our co2 emissions problem. At least now, people and congress are beginning to see that pollution is everyone's problem and polluter must assume responsibility. Superfunds ...

Fact1, On earth, without GHG the average global temp would be down by at least 32C. Fact2 we are adding to our level of GHG. Why do AGW supporters keep repeating stuff that is not in dispute as a form of argument. Any argument denying these facts just shows being ill-informed. Well then thank God s...

Alexjrgreen, You state the obvious about AGW and I agree. Here is an example of scientists working with the arguments used by skeptics even in this forum of prior cold and warm periods of the last 1000 years. Scientists are just getting better at explaining and modeling the regional differences in w...

Name one job that is at stake for investing? That very statement is evidence of your complete ignorance of economics. It is pointless to discuss how paying more for things costs jobs. But I'm willing to work with the ill educated so I will try. 1. There is a company of 10 people in competition with...

BTW the capital to crate a job in the USA runs about $150,000. So every $150,000 we pay for "Green Energy" above the price of other resources kills a job. If we subsidize "Green Energy" by $150 million we can kill 1,000 jobs. For only $1.5 billion in subsidy we can kill 10,000 jobs. If we can get t...

Good thing the President gets it as he spoke in Japan Nov 14,2009 "Working in partnership, this is how we can sustain this recovery and advance our common prosperity. But it's not enough to pursue growth that is balanced. We also need growth that is sustainable -- for our planet and the future gener...

Dear Seedload, That is good that you worked some data. Many scientists have done the same. If you can show me where all these scientists agree with your point of view, I will accept it. I'm not a contrary to the idea of where the data goes. I find it interesting that some seem to cling to these shor...

You're right about the voters in the USA. I too get my data and research papers from Joe the plumber, or Bob the builder. I'm surprised that the rest of the world body of scientists don't reference these highly regarded studies you boys like to use. As far as advocating suicide, Simon you should sho...

Aargh! That graph uses the *proven and admitted wrong* data from the GISS "Y2K Bug" that was adding 0.1 degrees per year to any data after 1999. Please go look at a modern graph. 2004 isn't even close to the hottest year (1934) and even 1998's massive El Nino spike only comes in second, with 7 of t...