Talk-Polywell.org

Carl White wrote:Another bit of news from Defkalion:

http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/07/defkal ... nergy.html

Well, this is really ensuring:

"power output of the device would be 35KW/h."

What unit is that?

D Tibbets wrote: Hydrogen doesn't give anything. It has zero binding energy. Nuclear binding energy only exists when two or more nucleons are bound together.

Ah, I see. Means H+H -> He is endotermic. Must be quite dark in your personal universe

So long as KitemanSA, etel continue to use the total binding energy graph/ tables as the indicator of the energy balance while ignoring the many links I have provided that clearly explain the proper way of using the binding energy per nucleon graph/ tables, he and I exist in separate universes- lit...

RaneesUm wrote: What are the motivations here? What are Rossi's expectations if he indeed is a liar? There doesn't appear to be any gain in it for him or anyone else involved in it.

Well, this story is so much similiar to Petroldragon story...

What would they lose if they released sufficient information to convince even you that the device was real? They would immediately generate competitors of unimaginable resources. I work in a small research institute but even we have more than enough equipment to reverse engineer an e-cat or engage ...

Giorgio wrote: Not sure what you mean, but you need about 5-6 times more energy to evaporate 1Kg of water than to bring it to 100'C.

Funny and obvious part here is that '6' is the claimed e-cat energy gain factor...

KitemanSA wrote:* * 200 * *

It does not count. You were cheating.

If Rossi is using a 15 mm ID hose, then a steam flow of 7 kg/h is consistent with his jacket temperature measurement of 101 degrees C. If Rossi is using a 13 mm ID hose, then a steam flow of 4.6 kg/h would be consistent with his jacket temperature measurement of 101 degrees C. Regardless of the tem...

Here is a different and fun tack. GIVEN the Krivit Video... What ways could this be a fraud? Let us start a list. :) Anyone? Here's another "fun" idea for a list. To wit, a list of the persons/entities who have the most to lose if RossiFusion really performs as advertised. a suggested entry: the Ru...

Plus I think they have the people and expertise to do it right and will probably use them since they know a lot of folks are watching (very closely). They do, and in the list of the names of the research team that I posted before there are some very expert researchers. If they will have free hand t...

@Giorgio Ok. Thank you for the info.I guess we are back to where we started. 1. Why is the thermocouple in the canister and not close to the inlet? 2. Why the double insulation between the pump and the inlet? @sparky0007 I am sorry, man, but the hose at the pump end seems to have the same restraint...

With each new test the COP gets lower and lower, and a value of 6.6 is even below many geothermal system available. Well, if you would like to defend Rossi, it is not impossible that "industrial" unit has less Q than experimental one due to engineering margins.... Nor is it impossible that the demo...

I was also reading a comment by someone correctly pointing to the fact that the steam coming out of the pipeline was little in respect to the expected amount according Rossi claims (7 Kg/h = 3.25 lt/sec). I have watched that part of the video few times and indeed the steam coming out from the line ...

From the video: Power IN = 0.75 Kw Power OUT = 5 Kw COP = 6.6 With each new test the COP gets lower and lower, and a value of 6.6 is even below many geothermal system available. Everyone is free to reach his own conclusions. Well, if you would like to defend Rossi, it is not impossible that "indust...

When you have evidences drop a note here, until than is pretty useless to get all excited. Actually, after reading all 170 pages, I would say what Axil and Kite are posting is the only sensible thing to do. I mean: this is 90% scam. However, there is 10% possibility that Rossi accidentally found so...