Search found 29 matches
- Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:55 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: regarding recirculation
- Replies: 57
- Views: 44844
One thing is that you will still have an infinite electric potential (and field) at the surface of the coil. Doing it the way I described will result in a finite and easily changed (but not quite constant) potential and field at the surface. (That way you could set the (average) potential on the gri...
- Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:51 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: regarding recirculation
- Replies: 57
- Views: 44844
...but in any case the idea for the surface is i just subtract "r" from the distance, so each line segment becomes, approximately, a cylinder with a hemisphere cap on each end. that gives you an extra sphere of charge at the intersections, though. but if one really wanted they could just put a poin...
- Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:32 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: regarding recirculation
- Replies: 57
- Views: 44844
So, between conduction and the small differences between charge inside and outside, is there any noticable induction induced charge seperation on the magrid metal surfaces? Dan Tibbets No, I don't think there will be much either, on a real polywell with conducting casings. I was talking about the s...
- Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:24 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: regarding recirculation
- Replies: 57
- Views: 44844
Perhaps I'm confused, but I don't follow your reasoning... Seems like we're talking past each other. I was just commenting that the charge on the grid looked like it was quite far from a realistic polywell and wondered why it still didn't show any recirculation of the electrons. The simulation I'm ...
- Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:06 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: regarding recirculation
- Replies: 57
- Views: 44844
total. so divide by 14336 to get per particle. also, i am using SI units, but the magrid charge is in coloumbs per square meter (surface area), or in the case of 0 thickness coils coloumbs per linear meter. and the slider for that one i haven't checked to see if i'm multilying it to the right const...
- Sun Jan 02, 2011 3:40 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: regarding recirculation
- Replies: 57
- Views: 44844
Your math/ assumptions are not right. Perhaps you are assuming a population of ~ 10^22 electrons/ M^3 in the Wiffleball and the associated coulomb repulsion (which would be huge)... I didn't consider any particle-particle interactions, just the grid. The question was if he was using SI units, i.e. ...
- Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:43 am
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: regarding recirculation
- Replies: 57
- Views: 44844
OK, that was what I thought. I've looked trough your recent videos of the "Escape from Coruscant"-sims and I haven't really seen any recirculation, just as you said. Once the electrons are outside they don't seem to be affected much by the grid which makes me wonder: Is this true as you zoom out, ar...
- Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:07 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: regarding recirculation
- Replies: 57
- Views: 44844
@happyjack27 Are you modelling the chamber as a simple loss radius? Just make sure to remember that the electric potential at the chamber is nonzero (and also different at different positions). I checked the 1m radius dodec - the potential at 2m is about half of that in the center of the grid and at...
- Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:17 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: regarding recirculation
- Replies: 57
- Views: 44844
from what i can tell from my sims: 1. w/an uncharged grid... I don't exactly remember what you said was the problem with the charge on the wires but I took a look at your static e-field code. The equation you're using seems right but I don't know if you implemented it correctly due to the lateish h...
- Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:22 am
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: Dumb Lorenz force question
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3670
Re: Dumb Lorenz force question
Lets see if I can answer this for you. The Lorentz force equation is: Lorenz Force = charge*[E field + (velocity x Magnetic field)] I don't know what the other formula would be. It looks somewhat like the E-cross-B drift velocity, v=(E x B)/B^2, which is derived using the Lorentz force and the equat...
- Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:58 am
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: thread for segments files and parameters for simulation runs
- Replies: 370
- Views: 168891
I think you forgot to take the inverse square of c - could be important :) My guess is this (using the standard SI units): RC2=1/(3 * 10^8 [m/s])^2 ~ 1.1 * 10^-17 [s^2/m^2] 1/E_TO_C=1/(1.6 * 10^-19 [C=As]) ~ 6.24 * 10^18 [1/As] This gives: ((RC2/E_TO_C)*0.002*0.00000000025) ~ 1.1 * 10^-17 * 6.24 * 1...
- Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:43 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: thread for segments files and parameters for simulation runs
- Replies: 370
- Views: 168891
Me bad - GL_LINES it will plot each pair of points as separate line segments; GL_LINE_STRIP will plot one line through each point in order, not the other way around :oops: I'll correct it. See for example http://fly.cc.fer.hr/~unreal/theredbook/ One can make the lines fatter with 'glLineWidth(width)...
- Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:22 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: thread for segments files and parameters for simulation runs
- Replies: 370
- Views: 168891
That sounds better, you'd need the capacitance of a thin finite wire (try wikipedia) or a torus. But you'll get problems if you want a zero radius... By the way: In case you haven't had any hints on how to draw the magrid. I've had a (very brief) introduction to openGL in a course I'm taking. Try in...
- Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:23 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: thread for segments files and parameters for simulation runs
- Replies: 370
- Views: 168891
Hi everyone. I've been lurking on the forum for quite some time, but this is my first post so please be patient if i say something stupid or make a mess of the formating :) in the meantime, can anyone tell me: given two sense points which tells me the electric charge at those point, in coloumbs -- g...