http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_vector_field
It doesn't matter what's happening near the mouths of the wormhole; the net result will be the same.
And what's this about an event horizon? A traversable wormhole shouldn't have an event horizon in the path of the matter traversing it...
Search found 1142 matches
- Sat Aug 23, 2014 12:59 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: For the same pricetag to mitigate climate change
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5483
- Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:42 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: For the same pricetag to mitigate climate change
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5483
Re: For the same pricetag to mitigate climate change
Think of it this way - a wormhole is just part of space. Since gravity is a potential field (to first order, at least - I need to learn more GR), the difference in gravitational potential between two points is the same whether you traverse the distance through a wormhole or through normal space. And...
- Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:30 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: nanosat programming questions
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2768
Re: nanosat programming questions
I'm not so sure about that tether. It would produce thrust as well as power, neither one easy to predict exactly, potentially swamping the signal from the thruster.
Why not solar?
Why not solar?
- Wed May 28, 2014 9:20 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: SpaceX News
- Replies: 2328
- Views: 1200766
Re: SpaceX News
Rocketdyne has been looking at selective laser melting for manufacturing RS-25 and J-2X parts. It works great; apparently it saved ~65% of the cost and ~97% of the manufacturing time for the first part they tried it on, and it ended up being a stronger part due to the lack of conventional welds.
- Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:26 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: SpaceX News
- Replies: 2328
- Views: 1200766
Re: SpaceX News
The Zenit costs even less than the Falcon, but it's old Russian tech and can't compete so far as the efficiency needed to tail land. The RD-171 is substantially more efficient than the Merlin 1D, by 26-27 seconds (8-10% depending on altitude). Zenit doesn't have the dry mass fraction of Falcon, whi...
Re: Go Navy!
I'd have thought they were already using liquid cooling, if heat dissipation is such an issue...
- Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:42 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: 20 years away, and always will be
- Replies: 137
- Views: 56548
Re: 20 years away, and always will be
*ahem*CharlesKramer wrote:General Atomics predicted fusion was 20 years away (in the 1970s)
- Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:58 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Reaction Engines
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14694
Re: Reaction Engines
I messed up. The airbreathing net thrust is not Fgross - Mcap*U. It's Fgross - 2*Mcap*U, because Mcap is per nacelle.
Peak airbreathing net thrust is about 200 tonnes for the whole vehicle.
(Weird how the average was 200 tonnes before, but oh well...)
Peak airbreathing net thrust is about 200 tonnes for the whole vehicle.
(Weird how the average was 200 tonnes before, but oh well...)
- Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:23 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker
- Replies: 1822
- Views: 1363539
Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker
I see what you're saying but I respectfully disagree. The debate is over when a person's argument is shown to be untenable or impotent, and they don't offer new arguments without the same issues. This may be true in some cases. I was overly absolute earlier. But in the scenario you describe, it had...
- Wed Feb 05, 2014 9:42 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker
- Replies: 1822
- Views: 1363539
Re: Recovery.Gov Project Tracker
therefore, the other person wins. As far as I'm concerned, you don't "win" an argument until both sides honestly agree on what the answer is. If the debate doesn't resolve, you've both lost. This doesn't mean it's a total waste of effort to argue on the internet (even if you're both total brick wal...
- Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:31 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Reaction Engines
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14694
Re: Reaction Engines
You don't actually have to fire a rocket engine in vacuum to test it. Everything downstream of the throat is supersonic (except for the boundary layer, which is pretty thin and dominated by the bulk flow), so pressure waves can't travel upstream in the bell, and the main combustion chamber has no wa...
- Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:05 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Reaction Engines
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14694
Re: Reaction Engines
People were trying to come up with ways to flight-test (or simulate) SABRE. I was wondering what the problem with ground testing is, considering that it's supposed to be followed by a Y-plane or two even before any production prototypes fly.
- Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:45 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Reaction Engines
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14694
Re: Reaction Engines
No one wants to discover a discrepancy in the available data for a promising project. But this is about as innocuous as they come, isn't it? It appears someone writing publicity copy typed "per engine" without really thinking, or perhaps misunderstood a nebulous statement from someone better informe...
- Tue Feb 04, 2014 7:26 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Reaction Engines
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14694
Re: Reaction Engines
From the spread sheet it is hard to see how that could be right but the documents were both from late 2012 so that's not it. Actually, based on the metadata the spreadsheet looks like it was created in 2004. It describes the Skylon C1 configuration, meaning the engine is probably the SABRE 2. The S...
- Tue Feb 04, 2014 3:47 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Reaction Engines
- Replies: 37
- Views: 14694
Re: Reaction Engines
I think the SR71 might be a good fit. Too small. SABRE 2 is twice the mass and between four and nine times the thrust of the J-58. And the SR-71 can't go much past Mach 3.6-3.7 or the windshield comes loose (so I hear). Have they done a full-engine computer simulation? Not sure if the technology is...