Talk-Polywell.org

[quote="happyjack27"] Climate change denial myth debunker [quote]

The name calling sure indicates "Siege mentality"

If you must though, I suggest that the term more accurate than "denier" and "denial" would be "infidel" and "infidelity"

] 2) As with your scenario here the theory would require a black and white prediction while the data point must represent a black and white observation contrary to the theory's ultimate prediction. AGW is not at all a theory that produces a black or white prediction and is not at all a theory that ...

* two data points do not a trend make * and Mars' climate is primarily driven by dust and albedo, not solar variations. I haven't heard this particular research or this spin on the Mars warming. What I read was NASA explaining the warming away as Mars emerging form its own ice age due to its own ve...

One data point is enough to refute the entire AGW This suffices to reveal your sense of proportion. "Global warming is a hoax. Because it's cold. Today. Where I live." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77GGn-E607E It is important what data point it is. Imagine a race of hydrophobic aliens evolving on...

While the Mars data is interesting, and factors in to our understanding, how is Mars a good control? Or Venus? The conditions and weather variables on those planets are considerably different. For example, completely different atmospheric composition and pressure without the kind of water we have o...

One data point is enough to refute the entire AGW This suffices to reveal your sense of proportion. "Global warming is a hoax. Because it's cold. Today. Where I live." This is what I am talking about when referring to the complete disregard for scientific method. When you do an experiment you alway...

I don't think pointing to one example of raw data being lost among billions of data points by hundreds of thousands of researchers could be called "cherry picking". No, I'd call that "dust picking". Well, I can't address "hundred of thousands data points" and discuss every single paper or research,...

The temperature measurement of 2 different gas jars where one contains several orders of magnitude of CO2 more than that claimed to cause the AGW seems like a good validation setup. If the temperatures significantly increased in the CO2 jar would that validate AGW? If so then the opposite result mu...

I don' t think you understand science. it's not about people, it's about facts and data and experiment and observation. I am very surprised you would say that after insisting that 99.9% scientists agree with AGW. I have already demonstrated that in the study the data was manipulated and no more tha...

So Mars global temperatures fluctuations aligned with those of Earth does not disprove AGW? The great theory of AGW is immune to the concept of control group? What anything else that can falsify it? How about growing Antarctic Ice Cap? NASA 2014 Antarctic ice reached new maximum https://www.nasa.gov...

There a petition signed by 31,000 scientists with US addresses saying “no convincing evidence” for human induced climate change. you can easily google it. Oh, I did: * http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-grandia/the-30000-global-warming_b_243092.html * http://www.snopes.com/30000-scientists-reject-...

There a petition signed by 31,000 scientists with US addresses saying “no convincing evidence” for human induced climate change. you can easily google it. Oh, I did: * http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-grandia/the-30000-global-warming_b_243092.html * http://www.snopes.com/30000-scientists-reject-...

I value critical thinking and pursuit of truth using the Scientific Method, with its 3 main tools: - control group - Ockham razor - falsifiable theories The AGW crowd is not very fond of those methods. Scientist are individuals, not a monolithic group. If it were then no critical thinking would happ...

Scientists do just not the ones you read about, because it is always those who spell doom that attract attention. Have you heard the CO2 calculating the observed drop in solar activity into predicted temperature changes? Any of them advocating using Mars as a control group? Their mantra is man-made ...

The problem with the AGW proponents is have a complete disregard for scientific method. There are multiple factors influencing the global temperatures: 1. Periodic variations in the output of the fusion reactor called Sun. The scientific method to see if that has any influence on the global temperat...