Search found 35 matches
- Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:58 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: The centenary of Super-Conductivity approaches
- Replies: 133
- Views: 33509
Ok, let's get to work here. A candidate model for SC must pass all know lab results with a reasonable explanation, qualitatively at least, until the calculations can be done to make it quantitative. Prof. Leggett told me that he hadn't heard of Josephson coupling over 10nm in vacuo, though he didn't...
- Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:54 am
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: Internal structure of the electrostatic force?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16764
- Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:26 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: The centenary of Super-Conductivity approaches
- Replies: 133
- Views: 33509
Interesting paper by McElroy et al.
He is electron tunnelling scanning a super-conducting lattice and only gets normal tunnelling, no Josephson current seems to be reported.
He is electron tunnelling scanning a super-conducting lattice and only gets normal tunnelling, no Josephson current seems to be reported.
- Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:53 pm
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: Internal structure of the electrostatic force?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16764
Hmm, didn't know strangeness applied to leptons. Presumably a neutrino has strangeness to balance neutron decay? Or weak force interactions don't play? Another thought I'd like to hear discussed is concerning neutrinos. We know they're fermions so presumably they nod to Pauli's Principle, but with n...
- Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:27 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: The centenary of Super-Conductivity approaches
- Replies: 133
- Views: 33509
Ok so Josephson Coupling is perfectly normal electron tunnelling, obeying Schroe's evanescent equation, but starting from a higher energy level than the fermi level due to the interstitial atom's higher potential. The locally reduced energy barrier, which is the work-function for metal vacuum bounda...
- Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:19 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: The centenary of Super-Conductivity approaches
- Replies: 133
- Views: 33509
JFP your model of SC relies on Wigner Orbitals. It is possible that you are referring to a Wigner crystal of electrons only, but it seems more likely that you're referring to the orbitals of interstitial atoms which will have a lower work function than the atoms around them. This presumably means th...
- Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:10 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: The centenary of Super-Conductivity approaches
- Replies: 133
- Views: 33509
Which orbitals of which atoms in which SC lattice? All known SCs? But anyway the point of that clip is that there is a lateral restitution force on the magnet. I'd suggest we are seeing the interplay of 3 magnetic entities. There is the magnetism of the ferromagnet, the captured magnetism in the SC ...
- Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:56 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: The centenary of Super-Conductivity approaches
- Replies: 133
- Views: 33509
I'm new here so can I continue to pretend we're all Gentlemen :D :D Surely, as physicists, the onus is on finding results that support or confound your position. Rather than insult would it not be more creative to design experiments that would show clearly one position or the other? This is a <2 min...
- Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:45 am
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: Internal structure of the electrostatic force?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16764
Internal structure of the electrostatic force?
I hope this is the right place to mention this. We are taught that the strong force overwhelms the electrostatic force by a critical amount. were it a smidgeon less then the universe would be entirely hydrogen, a smidgeon more and the universe would have burnt out yonks ago leaving lumps of an eleme...
- Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:34 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: The centenary of Super-Conductivity approaches
- Replies: 133
- Views: 33509
- Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:15 am
- Forum: Theory
- Topic: thread for segments files and parameters for simulation runs
- Replies: 370
- Views: 164830
- Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:38 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: The centenary of Super-Conductivity approaches
- Replies: 133
- Views: 33509
JFP, are you saying all SC phenomena may be explained by electrons only, all falling within the bounds of Maxwell's Laws and Schroe's equation? Schroe's is essentially an energy Hamiltonian for particle/waves so if SC phenomena are breaking it, it needs to be admitted as a paranormal lab result sure...
- Tue Jan 04, 2011 12:27 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: The centenary of Super-Conductivity approaches
- Replies: 133
- Views: 33509
Approaching this like a crossword clue, we have a whole lot of weird observations, some super-conduction (SC) only effects, some SC lattice interactions and some mistaken for SC. Pure SC effects are: Super-conduction Meissner / London Moment Josephson Coupling Andreev Reflection The right answer wil...
- Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:39 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Room-temperature superconductivity?
- Replies: 1893
- Views: 672887
- Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:37 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: The centenary of Super-Conductivity approaches
- Replies: 133
- Views: 33509
The centenary of Super-Conductivity approaches
Super-Conductivity was discovered in 1911 and 100 years later we still don't understand it. Though there are theories for how various lattices achieve this, none are universal and many are contradicted by other known results.