Talk-Polywell.org

I suspect that they'd be more in shock over the sort of real estate prices that uncontrolled immigration, the selling out to wealthy foreign investors, and artificially low interest rates bring.

I hope you all have been observing the ongoing attempt to reproduce Celani's apparatus and results: http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/replicate/progress-blog They are trying to be as open as can be and respond readily to any suggestions. Maybe you could give some valuable advice concerning calori...

ladajo wrote: The poster previously known as Parallel, now known as Dipshit ...

The quality of this board is deteriorating. I wish you people would step back and take a breather.

GIThruster wrote:Carl, several of the images of the object had it reverse direction.

Beamed propulsion cannot cause a craft to reverse direction.

True only if you're using a single ground station. Right?

First off, beam propulsion still needs propellant. You've merely offloaded the power generation. Since conventional propulsion uses energetic reactions for propulsion, you haven't saved much and you create the problems that craft are then all completely reliant upon their power from a ground statio...

Reminds me of Dr. Leik Myrabo's work.

http://www.lightcrafttechnologies.com/

seedload wrote:So, what do you think? Obama or Romney? Make your prediction now.

Does it even matter?

In my opinion, there's sufficient evidence that something unknown and unexpected is happening. There's just not sufficient evidence that Rossi has anything. Yet. In fact, doubts keep being raised. Who knows, all we can do is wait to see. There's no doubt that personal dislike for Rossi and the uncon...

Of course no one can see them -- they are invisible. And pink. You ask us to believe the evidence for invisible pink unicorns, and yet you contradict yourself in your first sentences. How can anything be both pink and invisible? The state of invisibility precludes the reflection of light of any wav...

Yes, it does. That's why physicists and others who know, know there is no point in testing GIT's or Shawyer Resonators. There's nothing wrong with questioning assumptions. It's a healthy thing for science, in fact. I'd like to see a small part of the overall science budget devoted to finding new wa...

I'm still waiting for someone to publish a clear set of instructions on how to build a working LENR device, available to everyone. It doesn't have to be a scientific publication, just serious and clearly written. It doesn't have to produce enormous levels of excess heat, just enough to be definitive...

I'm not sure everyone is following Tom Clarke's point and it is a good one. Reducing entropy locally does require increasing it in the rest of the system, which is universal, so it's fair to summarize that using M-E devices ought to hasten the end of the universe. It is essentially stealing and cau...

In all of the cases the observed excess output heat has been a small fraction of the input heat which could mean experimental error or simply a measurement issue. In the cases of higher claimes excess heat such as Rossi and Defcalion, the experimental setup has to be doubted. Also these have never ...

A translation of the latter paper has surfaced, along with some test data:

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@es ... 67942.html

Not sure whether this is new, but there's a longish video embedded
in the following article that was produced at SPAWAR.

"SPAWAR Space and Naval Warfare – LENR Proof"

http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2012/05/26 ... enr-proof/