seedload wrote: You are correct, I am not talking facts exactly, more circumstancial evidence, which puts people in jail in other contexts.
I wonder why you continue to challenge others for "facts" while you present none of your own.
I don't have any nor have I ever claimed to. Nor have I made decisions based on my lack of data.
Then he wrote:News flash. There are no facts.
Then why do you seem insistant on deciding? There are those who jump to a conclusion and then search for "facts" to support the decision (you?). There are those who let the facts lead them to a conclusion (me).
Then he wrote:Just a ever growing list of improbabilities that when multiplied together create an overall chance that this is real that approaches zero (my opinion).
Again, "probabilities" imply data not at hand. I guess you might say there is a low probability, but your confidence level on that statement HAS to be zero. And if there is zero confidence i
n a statement, why state it? (I am talking STATISTICAL confidence, not how warm and fuzzy you FEEL about the topic).
Then he wrote: That is my position and I strongly feel that it is not one that you should so easily dismiss
Your opinion is your opinion and no better than anyone elses. I am sorry if not being special upsets you. It truly is nothing personal!
Then he wrote: or determine to be ignorant.
But you JUST STATED that you have no data. You ARE ignorant. So am I. So is everyone on this forum, I would guess. Don't feel HURT by it. Do something about it, or accept your ignorance. MSimon seems to revell in his!