GIThruster wrote:
They can disagree all they like. The effect chris has written about again and again over the years cannot scale cubically with frequency and would not reverse with the thruster,
So, for one to understand so it may be explained to chrismb, you are saying that you can use a conventional understanding of physics to disprove a claim against a 'new' piece of physics which doesn't conform to current understanding.
One might suspect chrismb would say 'you're having your cake, AND eating it!'.
GIThruster wrote:
nor cancel when the thruster is placed in vertical.
chrismb would likely say you've lost your credibility at this point. vertical
to what, exactly? Vertical to some sort of 'true universal verticality' from which its 'inertia' is derived?
These machines that produce thrust from nowhere always come back to requiring a 'universal datum' to which they will react, so it's behaviour must vary whether it is on planet earth, the latitude it is at, and the time of day.
What is 'vertical' to an experiment in the US at 12 noon is horizontal at 6PM. What time of day did these experiments run?
These machines will be amazing because they should allow triangulation to the 'true universal stationary point'. Their performance will vary according to their location and attitude.