Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.
Moderators: tonybarry , MSimon
Stubby
Posts: 877 Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:05 pm
Post
by Stubby » Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:08 pm
Everything is bullshit unless proven otherwise. -A.C. Beddoe
GIThruster
Posts: 4686 Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm
Post
by GIThruster » Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:28 pm
I haven't see it either. . .in fact I still haven't. Doesn't say much.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis
kcdodd
Posts: 722 Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:36 am
Location: Austin, TX
Post
by kcdodd » Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:15 pm
Hydrogen (pp) fusion? What?
Carter
Stubby
Posts: 877 Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:05 pm
Post
by Stubby » Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:20 pm
Everything is bullshit unless proven otherwise. -A.C. Beddoe
GIThruster
Posts: 4686 Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm
Post
by GIThruster » Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:40 pm
This second link is calling the process "clean" but hydrogen fusion isn't aneutronic, is it? I thought the whole point of B11 fusion was it was clean compared to H fusion.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis
kcdodd
Posts: 722 Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:36 am
Location: Austin, TX
Post
by kcdodd » Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:24 pm
p-p fusion is itself aneutronic. it does produce a deuterium, which could hypothetically hit another deuterium . But the cross section for p-p fusion is so ridiculously small I don't think there is a way to even measure it on earth. To even mention it as a possible fuel blows any credibility I see.
Carter
djolds1
Posts: 1296 Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am
Post
by djolds1 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:05 am
Claiming DD, DT and pp fuel cycles. Good news if true.
Vae Victis
hanelyp
Posts: 2261 Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:50 pm
Post
by hanelyp » Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:58 pm
A PP fuel cycle outside stars greatly strains credibility.
Torulf2
Posts: 286 Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:50 pm
Location: Swedem
Post
by Torulf2 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:43 pm
This patent seems to be only about the container for the fusion.
djolds1
Posts: 1296 Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:03 am
Post
by djolds1 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:36 pm
hanelyp wrote: A PP fuel cycle outside stars greatly strains credibility.
Agreed. And I wonder why DHe3 wasn't cited - its nearly as "easy" as DD, and is publicly credited as "aneutronic."
Vae Victis