In simple terms, the comparison of the development of steel manufacturing to the free energy revolution promised by Rossiclown is a false one.
Unless you think steel manufacturing can power itself... if so, we have much more to talk about.
This is the basic problem with your argument. You can't see the trees for the forest, nor the forest for the trees in the desert. However, you are 100% sure there is a forest in the desert. Thus, in the mean time, you argue about the trees, and the forest, and ignore the fact you are in a desert.
A couple of simple truths:
If you put 1 watt in, and get 6 watts out, there is no valid nor viable reason that you could not closed loop the device, after you start it, and have it run as a completely isolated unit until it exhausts its fuel (six months or whatever he claims). So why again has not the Rossiclown been able to do this over the last seven years? Oh, because it would be unstable and unsafe he claims... but why? And, why can't the power be buffered to a battery or other intermediate storage/conversion device which would look JUST LIKE THE WALL POWER to the device?
Or, for example, how in the Rossiclown described unit its power output and COP is well self regulated to produce COP6, until the fuel is exhausted? No nuclear based reaction works this way; mass reacts at a reaction rate, as this mass decreases, so does the net power out due to less mass reacting. If you want consistent power, then you need to up the reaction opportunities, such as for example with more available neutrons (fission reactions), or more fuel mass.
These, and many other simple inconsistencies, are why it is evident it is an E-Crap as Giorgio so eloquently put it.
Rossi is full of shit.
I will be sad when you slink away after Rossiclown officially implodes (and probably ends up back in jail, or flees the country - my prediction).
I predict you are too much of a coward to face the music. I will miss our play time.