ITER Newsline Mention of Pollywell

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

AcesHigh
Posts: 655
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:59 am

Post by AcesHigh »

she was annoying! That surely changes EVERYTHING! Lets stomp every annoying woman in the face.

Betruger
Posts: 2321
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:54 am

Post by Betruger »

Why didn't the woman speak up about those key details precursor to the stomping? Is she a lesser version of this one?

http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/new ... ml?taf=pit

You can't have that stomping episode without both parties being pretty deranged. Add corrupt news media to the mix..

AcesHigh
Posts: 655
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:59 am

Post by AcesHigh »

its quite incredible to see rational people defending stomping that woman. Gee, no wonder you guys would vote for Christine O´Donnel


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oUFDOAyGYI

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

AcesHigh wrote:its quite incredible to see rational people defending stomping that woman. Gee, no wonder you guys would vote for Christine O´Donnel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oUFDOAyGYI
She was not stomped. She was not hospitalized. In any case the person who did it came forward and it will get judged in court.

Now compare that with the actual stomping of Ken Gladney.

The "lady" in question was trying to create an incident. She got her wish.

And Rand Paul looks well on his way to getting elected. :-)
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

TDPerk
Posts: 976
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Northern Shen. Valley, VA
Contact:

Post by TDPerk »

"Valle is shown rushing Rand Paul's car and shoving something into the window before it had come to a stop and again charging him as he exited the vehicle -- clearly provocative and threatening actions which should have alerted bystanders that she posed a danger. "

Aceshigh, the woman was filmed committing what in many places was a felony--people aren't supposed to throw things at moving vehicles. The police refused to stop her. There was no "stomping", not once.

The Paul supporters, every one of them, were far more solicitous of her safety in restraining her than would be police officers or the secret service.

There is no there there.
molon labe
montani semper liberi
para fides paternae patria

D Tibbets
Posts: 2775
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:52 am

Post by D Tibbets »

I see another thread has be hijacked by political rants. Oh well, here is my rant, certainly worth less than 2 cents.

Was the woman a provocateur and did she take actions that could reasonably be considered as a threat? Probably

Should the police have intervened? Probably

Did the individual that wrestled her to the ground act appropiatly? Probably

Did the man standing to the side that placed his foot on her neck then shoved down act appropriately? No

Did he cause physical harm to the woman? I seriously doubt it.

Might he have done so if his actions were not abbreviated by the cameras and others? I fear so.

Was the R. Paul campaign embarrassed? Yes.

Did the Rand Paul campaign distance themselves adequately? Yes, then No (they kept his donations)


Was the press coverage appropriate? Again, yes and no. It needed exposure, but the selective elements are biased. It is getting to the point that press coverage is like a trial. You need to see the presentation from both sides, then the viewer is inappropriately forced to act as a juror and decide the merits. Either that, of accept the presentation that best fits your world view.

Dan Tibbets
To error is human... and I'm very human.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

AcesHigh
Posts: 655
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:59 am

Post by AcesHigh »

I am not talking about Ron Paul. I am talking about stomping the woman. There are simply no excuses to it.

People dont stomp the idiots from Westboro Baptist Church, and they cause much more reason to be stomped.


Anyway, you guys should check David Frum interview to BBC.

The GOP is being taken over by the idiots of the Tea Party (not even the more rational founders of the tea party itself!) and idiotic anomalies like Christine O´Donnel.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

I am not talking about Ron Paul. I am talking about stomping the woman. There are simply no excuses to it.
Are you paying attention or just following a script?

It is RAND Paul.

And stomping? Held by a foot for a second or two is a stomping?

I'm glad to hear you were all over the beating of Ken Gladney by union thugs.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

AcesHigh wrote:The GOP is being taken over by the idiots of the Tea Party (not even the more rational founders of the tea party itself!) and idiotic anomalies like Christine O´Donnel.
Well thanks! You have cemented my vote. I'm a TEA Party Idiot.

I'm going to do a few more blog posts between now and TEA Day just to see a few more idiots elected to Congress. Thanks for boosting my enthusiasm. Better than viagra I tell ya.

TEA minus 4 and counting.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

icarus
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:48 am

Post by icarus »

Cops stomp on heads every day, and sit-on, man-handle to ground, rub noses into concrete ... it's a common tactic. Just watch the saturation 'reality' cop shows that are conditioning the mob for martial law/obedience.

Violence begets violence. No outrage allowed unless it fits the MSM agenda.

Betruger
Posts: 2321
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:54 am

Post by Betruger »

icarus wrote:Violence begets violence.
This. How can you be outraged by the stomp but not by what that lady did before it? Never mind to not be outraged at the media's failure to report impartially.

icarus
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:48 am

Post by icarus »

I think you've grasped the thorny end of stick again. Not at all outraged by any of it. The faux outrage, double, triple standards and inconsistency is what the MSM feeds on and feeds.

All outcomes are the best outcomes in the best of all possible worlds. Ohhhmmm. Violence begets vioence, the outer reflects the inner.

Betruger
Posts: 2321
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:54 am

Post by Betruger »

That was pointing out the inconsistency of AcesHigh.

zDarby
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:09 am

Post by zDarby »

"If you are not outraged, you're not paying attention"
~Bumper Sticker

You will note it doesn't say what, specifically, to be outraged about. :lol:

Did anyone else follow the trail of links, starting from the first one on page 1 of this thread, to Singularity Technologies? That guy was on some serious drugs when he came up with his world view of physics. :shock: The scary thing is, if you read through it, trying to grasp what that world view is, he'll start to make sense. :oops:

'Course, most anyone else wouldn't spend the time.
What can I say? I was bored!

Post Reply