Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:06 pm
OTH. Gravity is well understood in engineering level, but remains tough mystery for science.MSimon wrote:
LENR is not even to the well understood science level - let alone engineering.
a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
https://talk-polywell.org/bb/
OTH. Gravity is well understood in engineering level, but remains tough mystery for science.MSimon wrote:
LENR is not even to the well understood science level - let alone engineering.
Mechanism of inertia as well.CherryPick wrote:OTH. Gravity is well understood in engineering level, but remains tough mystery for science.MSimon wrote:
LENR is not even to the well understood science level - let alone engineering.
And what is legit in that some web-resource for promoting something changes protosource words changing main idea?Maui wrote:I dunno, I know its not official, but it looks pretty legit to me.Joseph Chikva wrote:Please give a link where he is saying the same except ecatplanet.net.
There are a lot of links with Bushnell saying similar things. Clearly he is a believer in the LENR phenomena. Although you would think if NASA was working on this, they would have been further along by now.Joseph Chikva wrote:And what is legit in that some web-resource for promoting something changes protosource words changing main idea?Maui wrote:I dunno, I know its not official, but it looks pretty legit to me.Joseph Chikva wrote:Please give a link where he is saying the same except ecatplanet.net.
With all respect Mr. Bushnell he is not authority for me. As I know that in such organizations as NASA in perspective research departments for brain storm often work people generating mad ideas. And probability of further embodiment of those one per million. Such situation was in former Soviet Union too.
Anyway, even if he spoke as has been quoted (and I am assured that he didn't speak so) as I understand Mr. Bushnell isn't an official NASA spokesman.
I see that he is believer that LENR is possible. But any physics will send Rossi to his died parents addressing with not quite good words seeing how Rossi makes calorimetry claiming excess heat. Regardless to in what he trusts: in LENR or in Evil.JoeP wrote:There are a lot of links with Bushnell saying similar things. Clearly he is a believer in the LENR phenomena.
Take it easy on the metaphors, Joe. It is difficult enough to parse as it isJoseph Chikva wrote:I see that he is believer that LENR is possible. But any physics will send Rossi to his died parents addressing with not quite good words seeing how Rossi makes calorimetry claiming excess heat. Regardless to in what he trusts: in LENR or in Evil.JoeP wrote:There are a lot of links with Bushnell saying similar things. Clearly he is a believer in the LENR phenomena.
Difficult but not impossible I hope? Ok I will try to speak without metaphors.JoeP wrote:Take it easy on the metaphors, Joe. It is difficult enough to parse as it is
Here are some ecatplanet.net links for you (as well as links to the Nelson and Zawodny presentations):Joseph Chikva wrote:Please give a link where he is saying the same except ecatplanet.net . As little Google search gave me the following:Kahuna wrote:http://www.ecatplanet.net/content.php?1 ... SA-Langley
Selected Quotes:
Over 2 decades with over 100 experiments worldwide indicate LENR is real,...Also as I understand unlike Rossi Widom and Larsen do not claim about production of net power. Where does Mr. Bushnell speaks about Rossi except pro-Rossi's web-sites? And as if I recall correctly Rossi denies Widom-Larsen theory.Low-energy nuclear reactors (LENRs), otherwise known as cold fusion reactors, were considered impossible to build a decade ago but are gaining attention thanks to the work of Allan Widom and Lewis Larsen, who have proposed a new theory to explain how LENR might work. NASA is conducting experiments in an attempt to verify their theory, which explains the decades-long LENR experiments as products of quantum weak interaction theory applied to condensed matter, not fusion.
Andand can not report anything valuable yet and Rossi can?NASA is conducting experiments in an attempt to verify their theory,…
The poor man lending even coffee machine and not knowing how to measure heat?
good find.ladajo wrote: http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/ ... -workshop/
Krivit's write up on the FOIA pull.
Would you like to say some not ecatplanet.net links?Kahuna wrote:Here are some ecatplanet.net links for you (as well as links to the Nelson and Zawodny presentations):
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government ... rkshop.pdf
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government ... rkshop.pdf
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government ... rkshop.pdf
Yeah. But the slides were overly optimistic, don't you think?ScottL wrote:Just finished the PDFs, they're short. To summarize what they say:
If the devices works, it maybe a source for cheaper power, but they need to be independently verified. Suprise, surprise, the same things we've been saying from the beginning.