SpaceX News

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Skipjack
Posts: 6823
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Skipjack »

Maui wrote:
Skipjack wrote: RTLS is much simpler, all it costs is fuel and that is extremely cheap compared to the rest of the launch costs (Musk once said about 200k USD for a launch).
I don't think anyone questions that RTLS is ideal if you can do it. My question, at least, is HOW is this done.
Skipjack wrote: So the only additional fuel you need is for the burn that flies you back. So the difference is not that huge.
This is the part I'm having a hard time with... if I had to guess, by the time the first stage separates, I'd think ~90% of the momentum is along the x-axis. Gravity, in this case, doesn't help you much in getting back to the launch site. Reversing course (even on an empty 1st stage) strikes me as impractical/impossible... though I'm certainly open to the fact that my hunch is wrong. Someone earlier suggested it might be easier to actually accelerate further to make it once around... this strikes me as somewhat more possible. Even then, still surprised it only means sacrificing 30% payload, though.
Actually the stage still has a lot of upwards momentum after staging and it continues up during the braking burn. Someone did a really solid calculation of that and posted it at NSF.
Image
Note that this graph is an older version with data available in 2012. I know it was updated later, but it should give you a general idea.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: SpaceX News

Post by ladajo »

Image fail.
Link also failed.

Can you repost?

Also,
the first stage separation would occur at a velocity of approximately 2.0 km/s (6,500 km/h; 4,100 mph; Mach 6) rather than the 3.4 km/s (11,000 km/h; 7,000 mph; Mach 10) for an expendable Falcon 9, to provide the residual fuel necessary for the deceleration and turnaround maneuver and the controlled descent and landing.
This statement does not include a "fly back" stage. What I see is a desciption for a pitch over, burn, descent and land.

Also, by limiting the first stage boost to 4100mph, vice 7000mph, how much does that limit the achievable orbital profile and payload? That is like almost cutting the boost in half.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

mvanwink5
Posts: 2157
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Re: SpaceX News

Post by mvanwink5 »

Hard for me to see how much is lost as mass is lower with fuel and 1st stage separation. I dunno. It is all in the actual numbers.
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

Skipjack
Posts: 6823
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Skipjack »

ladajo wrote:Image fail.
Link also failed.

Can you repost?

Also,
the first stage separation would occur at a velocity of approximately 2.0 km/s (6,500 km/h; 4,100 mph; Mach 6) rather than the 3.4 km/s (11,000 km/h; 7,000 mph; Mach 10) for an expendable Falcon 9, to provide the residual fuel necessary for the deceleration and turnaround maneuver and the controlled descent and landing.
This statement does not include a "fly back" stage. What I see is a desciption for a pitch over, burn, descent and land.

Also, by limiting the first stage boost to 4100mph, vice 7000mph, how much does that limit the achievable orbital profile and payload? That is like almost cutting the boost in half.
The image at the link shows an estimated trajectory of the stage flying all the way back to the launch site from the staging point (it is in line with projections made by others that wanted to do RTLS). The current F9 1.1 is already staging at mach 6 with the trajectory that goes with that. According to Gwynne Shotwell, the 13 tonnes payload quoted on SpaceX site also already include the reuse penalty (otherwise the payload would have been a lot more) for the first stage.

The image works for me, oddly enough, even shows up embedded in the forum. Try this link (copy and paste it, if you have to):
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index. ... 7576;image

mvanwink5
Posts: 2157
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Re: SpaceX News

Post by mvanwink5 »

Nice graphs, the range vs altitude doesn't show a full return unless I am missing something.
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

Skipjack
Posts: 6823
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Skipjack »

mvanwink5 wrote:Nice graphs, the range vs altitude doesn't show a full return unless I am missing something.
Yes it does. The graph starts at staging, not at liftoff.

Skipjack
Posts: 6823
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Skipjack »

http://www.space-multimedia.nl.eu.org/i ... le&id=8856
Dragon hatch opening and unloading.

mvanwink5
Posts: 2157
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Re: SpaceX News

Post by mvanwink5 »

bottom left graph? Top only shows return to ground, not to origination, right? Sorry I am so slow at understanding the graphing context here..
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

Skipjack
Posts: 6823
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Skipjack »

mvanwink5 wrote:bottom left graph? Top only shows return to ground, not to origination, right? Sorry I am so slow at understanding the graphing context here..
They all show the same thing. In each graph the x and y axis represent different aspects of the flight envelope. The bottom left graph gives you the best idea of the actual trajectory.

mvanwink5
Posts: 2157
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Re: SpaceX News

Post by mvanwink5 »

Skipjack,
To me the lower left graph indicates the down range termination of flight to be 80 miles from origination, that is what has me hung up, and further, that graph seems to be the only one that shows more than velocity acceleration, and altitude, and the only one to include the downrange position. Thanks for attempting to clear my understanding though. I just must be just missing the context.
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

Skipjack
Posts: 6823
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Skipjack »

mvanwink5 wrote:Skipjack,
To me the lower left graph indicates the down range termination of flight to be 80 miles from origination, that is what has me hung up, and further, that graph seems to be the only one that shows more than velocity acceleration, and altitude, and the only one to include the downrange position. Thanks for attempting to clear my understanding though. I just must be just missing the context.
The graph STARTS at stage separation that is at 80 miles altitude, it does not end there. The top graphs show seconds into the launch on X axis and altitude, dynamic pressure and velocity on the Y axis.
The bottom left graph shows range on the X axis (distance from launch site) and altitude on the Y axis. The bottom right graph shows seconds into the launch on the X and acceleration on the Y axis.

mvanwink5
Posts: 2157
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Re: SpaceX News

Post by mvanwink5 »

Thanks! I had the path backwards, no wonder! :D
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

Skipjack
Posts: 6823
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Skipjack »

mvanwink5 wrote:Thanks! I had the path backwards, no wonder! :D
Don't worry! It is easy to get confused. First time I looked at it, I just had the bottom left one and I thought the same thing. I needed the context of the other graphs to understand what was going on.

mvanwink5
Posts: 2157
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:07 am
Location: N.C. Mountains

Re: SpaceX News

Post by mvanwink5 »

I had pilot fixation, couldn't reverse my eyes.
Counting the days to commercial fusion. It is not that long now.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: SpaceX News

Post by ladajo »

That is a long way back for stuff to go wrong. It still speaks for over water, vice land.

Thanks for the graphs. I would like to see SpaceX's actuals vice a fanboy estimate. But these will do for now.

Still seems like a stiff penalty in lost lift capacity. But I do see the benefit of getting the primary back for recycle.
Too bad they don't get the secondary back as well. Another engine and tank cheaper.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

Post Reply