SpaceX News

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Tom Ligon
Posts: 1871
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:23 am
Location: Northern Virginia
Contact:

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Tom Ligon »

This judge is holding up his 8 card. Good landing, but a mandatory 2 point deduction for not remaining upright.

Seriously, that was right on target, no sideways motion, and then the gizmo didn't catch. Pretty close.

Maui
Posts: 587
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Madison, WI

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Maui »

A standing problem, not a landing problem.

paperburn1
Posts: 2484
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
Location: Third rock from the sun.

Re: SpaceX News

Post by paperburn1 »

They are theorizing that it's ice buildup on the latching mechanism that costed to not fully engage allowing the link to collapse after landing. I guess they don't have any down and locked sensors like an aircraft landing gear. But I guess is no real point to that because it's a suicide landing anyway.
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.

paperburn1
Posts: 2484
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:53 am
Location: Third rock from the sun.

Re: SpaceX News

Post by paperburn1 »

Interesting quote
“Ship landings are not needed for flexibility or to save fuel costs,” Musk posted on Twitter. “Just not physically possible to return to launch site if speed at stage separation > ~6000 km/hr (3,728 mph). With a ship, no need to zero out lateral velocity, so can stage at up to ~9000 km/h (5,592 mph).”

Strut is becoming Elon Musk's least favorite word. tank strut, leg strut,
I am not a nuclear physicist, but play one on the internet.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: SpaceX News

Post by ladajo »

As I recall, we talked about this a while back when we were trying to understand the kinematics of getting back to the same dirt as the launch site. There was some debate about how doable it was. Here is a clear answer. It is doable up to a point. The other way is to make the loop around the ball. But I am doubtful of 1st stage kinematics to support that, to include any required lateral translation to account for launch azimuths.
The current, boost, seperate, 1st stage boost up again, decell, loop an arc back over to opposite flight path, braking, and fall back to landing is an elegant use of physics.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: SpaceX News

Post by ladajo »

I will also be interested to see the detailed report on the landing topple. Watching the video a few times for barge pitching, it was on a down pitch in the direction of the topple. You can see it by watching the deck relative to horizon. It also looks like the leg more buckled than folded. Also, the rocket body really appears to be flexing over early during the tip, to coincide with the pitching. I am sure they have other data not shared yet. Hmmm. Waiting for further analysis.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

Skipjack
Posts: 6823
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Skipjack »

ladajo wrote:I will also be interested to see the detailed report on the landing topple. Watching the video a few times for barge pitching, it was on a down pitch in the direction of the topple. You can see it by watching the deck relative to horizon. It also looks like the leg more buckled than folded. Also, the rocket body really appears to be flexing over early during the tip, to coincide with the pitching. I am sure they have other data not shared yet. Hmmm. Waiting for further analysis.
The bending and flexing is said to be an optical illusion due to the wide angle lens in that camera. There are other shots from different cameras that do not show the "flexing". According to Musk, the lock that holds the landing leg was frozen by ice that formed due to the extreme fog. It would not latch into place, allowing the leg to fold back up.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: SpaceX News

Post by ladajo »

I buy the lensing effect. Thought about that when watching. But I have not yet seen other angles.
The leg really does not seem to fold as much as it buckles. I did see Musk's post on ice.
Detailed study report will be interesting.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

Skipjack
Posts: 6823
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Skipjack »

Have you seen these?
Not sure if you can see those without a NSF account but talk polywell wont let me attach images of this size :(
Image
Image
Image

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: SpaceX News

Post by ladajo »

I used to have an NSF a long time back, but haven't been there forever.
Was there any showing the initial fail?
These are nice, thanks.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

Skipjack
Posts: 6823
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Skipjack »

ladajo wrote: Was there any showing the initial fail?
I have not seen any. Only these. I mainly posted them because they don't seem to have that barrel- lens- distortion of the video camera. I hope that they will release more images soon.
NSF is very different from talk polywell, certainly a lot stiffer and less casual. There is a lot of good info to be found there, though.

ladajo
Posts: 6258
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: North East Coast

Re: SpaceX News

Post by ladajo »

One of the reasons I stopped regular visits was a sense of pomposity pervading many discussions. I prefer more casual discourse. I get enough formality in my work.
That said, I do agree that some of the the threads have been very informative and have held posters with good access to real information.
The development of atomic power, though it could confer unimaginable blessings on mankind, is something that is dreaded by the owners of coal mines and oil wells. (Hazlitt)
What I want to do is to look up C. . . . I call him the Forgotten Man. (Sumner)

Tom Ligon
Posts: 1871
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:23 am
Location: Northern Virginia
Contact:

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Tom Ligon »

paperburn1 wrote:They are theorizing that it's ice buildup on the latching mechanism that costed to not fully engage allowing the link to collapse after landing. I guess they don't have any down and locked sensors like an aircraft landing gear. But I guess is no real point to that because it's a suicide landing anyway.


But does a sensor help? If it didn't latch, it is going over, and a warning light just rubs it in. The time between deploying the struts and landing is pretty short, and what ya gonna do about it?

Redundant latches might work. Or latch heating. A bit of hot air down the struts could help, and there is a heat source cranking it out down at the aft end.

I'm wondering how many times I've had a tripod leg slip, or maybe a folding chair not quite latched.

Skipjack
Posts: 6823
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: SpaceX News

Post by Skipjack »

IIRC most people at NSF believe that a simple heater of sorts would be the easiest solution.

D Tibbets
Posts: 2775
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:52 am

Re: SpaceX News

Post by D Tibbets »

Tom Ligon wrote:
paperburn1 wrote:They are theorizing that it's ice buildup on the latching mechanism that costed to not fully engage allowing the link to collapse after landing. I guess they don't have any down and locked sensors like an aircraft landing gear. But I guess is no real point to that because it's a suicide landing anyway.


But does a sensor help? If it didn't latch, it is going over, and a warning light just rubs it in. The time between deploying the struts and landing is pretty short, and what ya gonna do about it?

Redundant latches might work. Or latch heating. A bit of hot air down the struts could help, and there is a heat source cranking it out down at the aft end.

I'm wondering how many times I've had a tripod leg slip, or maybe a folding chair not quite latched.
That depends. If it is a spring release that drives the locking pin/ cylinder, then it is a one shot deal. If it is an electrical solenoid with a spring return if the latch does not lock it in place might allow several firings over a couple of seconds time. The landing leg deployment might have to start 1-2 seconds earlier to allow time for this...

If ice prevents full deployment,then the pin may never line up. An increase in tolerances may help this. A Kalashnikov approach instead of an M16 approach...

Dan Tibbets
To error is human... and I'm very human.

Post Reply