Tri Alpha talk

Point out news stories, on the net or in mainstream media, related to polywell fusion.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

Post Reply
Solo
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Tri Alpha talk

Post by Solo »

Coming to UW-Madison Monday Apr 29:

Prof. Houyang Guo
- Chief experimental strategist of Tri Alpha Energy, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
- Also professor and director of Tokamak Division Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui, P.R. China

He will give two presentations:
"Progress toward Long Pulse Operation in EAST Superconducting Tokamak"
"Overview of C-2 Compact Toroid Merging Experiments"

Anybody have some intelligent questions they would like me to pose?

Skipjack
Posts: 6823
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:29 pm

Re: Tri Alpha talk

Post by Skipjack »

Yes, me, me, me!
The C2 experiment has recently had some great success with neutral beam injection. How much more do confinement times have to increase to allow for D+T fusion and what are their plans to achieve that? Are they planning to continue the research with C2, or will they move on to a bigger, more powerful device soon?

Solo
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Tri Alpha talk

Post by Solo »

My notes from the talk:
-150 on staff (!!)
-5ms plasma lifetime, presently limited not by instabilities but by ~1ms confinement time (energy, particles)
-very reproducible discharges despite dynamic merging procedure
-Te ~100eV, Ti ~ 400eV
-20keV beam ions orbit passes through edge, important to keep neutral density down
-plasma guns help stabilize MHD instabilities, other turbulence by biasing & driving anti-rotation
- confinement scales like (Te * r_s)^2 which is very favorable
- planning C-3 device with 100ms-1s confinement times by increased size, heating power

kurt9
Posts: 589
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA

Re: Tri Alpha talk

Post by kurt9 »

A staff of 150 people? That's quite a lot. Either Tri-Alpha is on the verge of making it or it has become a bloated bureaucracy. I certainly hope for the former. If so, we should have commercial fusion by the end of the decade - 2020.

I have seen a job advert for a PLC control system engineer, which I have applied for. I did not hear back from them, suggusting they found someone local to do the job (I do not live in SoCal). Nevertheless, I hope they are successful.

D Tibbets
Posts: 2775
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:52 am

Re: Tri Alpha talk

Post by D Tibbets »

Solo wrote:My notes from the talk:
-150 on staff (!!)
-5ms plasma lifetime, presently limited not by instabilities but by ~1ms confinement time (energy, particles)
-very reproducible discharges despite dynamic merging procedure
-Te ~100eV, Ti ~ 400eV
-20keV beam ions orbit passes through edge, important to keep neutral density down
-plasma guns help stabilize MHD instabilities, other turbulence by biasing & driving anti-rotation
- confinement scales like (Te * r_s)^2 which is very favorable
- planning C-3 device with 100ms-1s confinement times by increased size, heating power
While I do not follow the significance of all of these numbers, the demonstrated energy confinement time of a few milliseconds is similar to that for the small Polywells (WB6). The question then becomes at what effective densities they are operating at. If at Tokamak densities of 10^19 to 10^20 / M^3 they have a ways to go. If higher densities, they are getting close, at least for D-T fusion. My understanding is that for D-D fusion the confinement times will need to be ~ 100 times longer (at the same density), and the temperatures will need to be higher relative to D-T fusion.

The electron and ion average (?) temperatures seem unimpressive though, assuming I am reading them right. If the plasma is thermalized, the lower electron temperatures relative to the ion temperatures, may be beneficial from a Bremsstruhlung perspective.

Dan Tibbets
To error is human... and I'm very human.

kcdodd
Posts: 722
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:36 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Tri Alpha talk

Post by kcdodd »

What density?
Carter

Solo
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Tri Alpha talk

Post by Solo »

I didn't catch the density from his talk, but looking at their paper, which has most of the same content, it's about 4e19/m^3.

The temperatures are thermal. They have a Doppler spectrometer (Ti) and a Thomson Scattering (Te) system. There will of course be a high-energy tail for the ions due to the NBI.

To put these numbers in perspective, MST runs ~1e19/m^3, 200-600eV Te, Ti similar, confinement times about 1ms.

Also, the paper notes that increasing the mirror ratio does not improve the confinement time, which implies that most of the confinement is being done by the FRC itself, which is good to hear.

Stubby
Posts: 877
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:05 pm

Re: Tri Alpha talk

Post by Stubby »

http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/bulleti ... ject/19039

same old same old new website

most everyone except emc2 mentioned
Everything is bullshit unless proven otherwise. -A.C. Beddoe

Post Reply