Page 1 of 1

Superconductivity Theory

Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:29 pm
by Mike Holmes
Once again I'll leave it to the well educated on the subject to say if this has any importance:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 132930.htm

The story sure sounds interesting...

Mike

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 3:40 pm
by Brandon
Having near-zero resistance to electric current is very applicable to polywell, especially if this can be done at temperatures closer to room temperature...electron flow = magnetic field :D

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:32 pm
by drmike
Basically, they tried to break a superconductor in a known way, and it didn't break. So they came up with a model that explains this. A more fundamental question will be is their model correct, or is there some other way to explain the behavior.

In any case, it is a really nice discovery. Proves there is a hell of a lot we still don't know about how things work!

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:26 am
by KitemanSA
What interests me is the recent indications of superconductivity near 200K. That should be quite easy to support. Not room temperature, but a lot closer than 77K.

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:12 pm
by Mike Holmes
Yeah, that's mentioned in the Wikipedia article here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-tempe ... rconductor

Mike

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:21 pm
by scareduck
KitemanSA wrote:What interests me is the recent indications of superconductivity near 200K. That should be quite easy to support. Not room temperature, but a lot closer than 77K.
Superconductivity at liquid nitrogen temperatures would be a big improvement over liquid helium temperatures.

Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 1:33 am
by KitemanSA
scareduck wrote:
KitemanSA wrote:What interests me is the recent indications of superconductivity near 200K. That should be quite easy to support. Not room temperature, but a lot closer than 77K.
Superconductivity at liquid nitrogen temperatures would be a big improvement over liquid helium temperatures.
You bet, and SC at dry-ice temperatures would be better still!

Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:45 pm
by Professor Science
KitemanSA wrote:
scareduck wrote:
KitemanSA wrote:What interests me is the recent indications of superconductivity near 200K. That should be quite easy to support. Not room temperature, but a lot closer than 77K.
Superconductivity at liquid nitrogen temperatures would be a big improvement over liquid helium temperatures.
You bet, and SC at dry-ice temperatures would be better still!
assuming you don't use dry ice, solids are hard to pump, I'd wager.

Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:37 am
by KitemanSA
Professor Science wrote:
KitemanSA wrote:You bet, and SC at dry-ice temperatures would be better still!
assuming you don't use dry ice, solids are hard to pump, I'd wager.
True.
In the NASA... forum that preceded this one there was a long discussion on using certian electronics cooling fluids as a preference to LN because they have a much higher specific heat, but it turns out they get gloppy at LN temperatures. I suspect they would be a lot less viscous at 200K than 77k.

Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 3:26 am
by hanelyp
Professor Science wrote:
KitemanSA wrote:You bet, and SC at dry-ice temperatures would be better still!
Assuming you don't use dry ice, solids are hard to pump, I'd wager.
Assuming dry ice as a refrigerant, alcohol or acetone might be circulated for heat transfer. But in any case, the higher your superconductor operating temperature, the easier the refrigeration.

acetone as a thermally conductive medium

Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 10:49 pm
by StevePoling
Assuming dry ice as a refrigerant, alcohol or acetone might be circulated for heat transfer.
Back in college I wandered past a lab and saw some friends goofing around with dry ice and acetone. They did most of the same fun things (e.g. shattering roses) you see done with liquid nitrogen.

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:19 am
by Professor Science
to be fair liquid nitrogen is somewhat overkill for things like that, as it's at 70 K, while dry ice would probably be around 220 K, maybe a bit lower. water freezes spontaneously at 233 K and the acetone likely just provided something to conduct the heat to and from readily.

edit: OK, bad use of the term spontaneously, i meant without crystaline seed. water can be chilled considerably below 0 celsius if it doesn't have something to form a crystal around. example.

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:34 am
by MSimon

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:37 am
by Professor Science
I was working off of -50 celsius, guess i had a trivia point mis memorized. to be fair, the only time i needed a specific temperature on it was to figure out if i could use it as a coolant for my super chilled water runs and when i found out it was too cold i disregarded it all together.