Fusors and p-B11

Discuss how polywell fusion works; share theoretical questions and answers.

Moderators: tonybarry, MSimon

TallDave
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Contact:

Post by TallDave »

Int,

Depends how much fusion you want, and how much you're willing to spend. You'll never get anyhere near Q, of course. It might be possible to get measurable p-B11 fusions out of a fusor before it melts/shorts/ablates/etc into nonfunctionality, but I don't think anyone's done it yet, which suggests it's not easy.

Keep in mind, if I'm understanding the fusor design correctly, the inner grid not only has to hold a huge negative charge but also gets hit by some percentage of those extremely energetic p and B11 ions.

Has anyone ever run a fusor at 200 kEv drive? Not sure what the technical challenges are there.
Last edited by TallDave on Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
n*kBolt*Te = B**2/(2*mu0) and B^.25 loss scaling? Or not so much? Hopefully we'll know soon...

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

Munchausen wrote:
The polywell will face similar trade-offs but may come to a different conclusion. In particular, if the thermal load is (as is the dream) primarily bremsstrahlung radiation and alpha particles, the erosion process will be very different from that due to the high-power, low-temperature plasma in a tokamak divertor.


This sounds like expensive and time consuming technical development? Isnt it better to aim for an esier fuel (D-Doch D-T) and steam cycle energy extraction in the first place? If the polywell contraption should show any signs of life.
The trade off is protecting the superconductors from high neutron flux. I have a proposed design which might be workable (water cooling/moderation B10 neutron absorption) but it will increase the reactor volume some. Also the neutron flux will deposit about 2.8 MeV per neutron absorbed by the B10. That is in the same ball park as alpha impingement.

At the 100 MW level two paths may be useful (D-D and pB11) to get to a "final" reactor design. The engineering problems are significantly different once you get past the basics.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

TallDave wrote:Int,

Depends how much fusion you want. You'll never get anyhere near Q, of course. It might be possible to get measurable p-B11 fusions out of a fusor before it melts/shorts/etc, but I don't think anyone's done it yet, which suggests it's not easy.

Has anyone ever run a fusor at 200 kEv drive? Not sure what the technical challenges are there.
If you go for the resonance peak 70KV should be adequate (includes well losses). Well within current high end fusor designs.

No need to run a fusor til it melts to get experimental results.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

TallDave
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Contact:

Post by TallDave »

Resonance certainly wouldn't hurt. This is the POPS compression we're talking about here, right? How difficult/expensive is that?

I do wonder if current fusor grids would have a problem with the heavier B11 ions hitting them vs. the usual D or T.
n*kBolt*Te = B**2/(2*mu0) and B^.25 loss scaling? Or not so much? Hopefully we'll know soon...

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

TallDave wrote:Resonance certainly wouldn't hurt. This is the POPS compression we're talking about here, right? How difficult/expensive is that?

I do wonder if current fusor grids would have a problem with the heavier B11 ions hitting them vs. the usual D or T.
POPS compression would add a few hundred dollars at hobby levels.

The big problem with pB11 experiments is alpha detectors.

Simon
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

TallDave
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:12 pm
Contact:

Post by TallDave »

Heh, I guess maybe that's one reason no one's done this: there are certainly easier ways to get a few alphas.

classicpenny
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: Port Angeles WA USA
Contact:

Post by classicpenny »

MSimon wrote:
The big problem with pB11 experiments is alpha detectors.

Simon
I did not realize this was a problem. I guess I was assuming that we would look for helium in the spectra of the gases removed from the chamber after a trial.

Bill Flint

MSimon
Posts: 14335
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: Rockford, Illinois
Contact:

Post by MSimon »

classicpenny wrote:
MSimon wrote:
The big problem with pB11 experiments is alpha detectors.

Simon
I did not realize this was a problem. I guess I was assuming that we would look for helium in the spectra of the gases removed from the chamber after a trial.

Bill Flint
To be sure of fusion and not trace gases or side reactions you want to look for alphas of a specific energy.

So the detectors will need to be in the vacuum.
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Post Reply