Page 1 of 1
					
				Magrid design.
				Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:38 am
				by Torulf2
				How about this magrid design? Have it been something like this before?
Its a twisted circle, its have two gaps and the magnet lines are closed.
[img]
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8237/8516 ... _b.jpg[img]
 
			 
			
					
				Re: Magrid design.
				Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:40 am
				by Stubby
				Torulf2 wrote:How about this magrid design? Its have been something like this before?
Its a twisted circle, its have two gaps and the magnet lines are closed.

 
 
			 
			
					
				Re: Magrid design.
				Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:37 am
				by KitemanSA
				Looks like it would have one hellaciously long line cusp.  They tend to leak badly.
			 
			
					
				Re: Magrid design.
				Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:37 pm
				by jrvz
				You can think of this as a descendent of the "baseball seam" devices from the 70s.  See: 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/llnl/3085193876/ 
			 
			
					
				Re: Magrid design.
				Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:56 pm
				by hanelyp
				2 very long line cusps, but yes leaky.
			 
			
					
				Re: Magrid design.
				Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:53 pm
				by DeltaV
				Nice graphic, Torulf.  
But, if it breaks, will it leak mercury?  :)
Posting a historical link to other spherical magrids:
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2649
Rjay goes crazy with spherical meanders starting around page 10.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: Magrid design.
				Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:58 am
				by D Tibbets
				Long line cusps but narrower. It is a partiial solution and I suspect is approaching what I have considered and what I suspect is the Skunk works design.  A key point is forming a single central magnetic null that might lend itself to Wiffleball inflation.
Also, I'm uncertain what the B field is like where the magnet reverses direction. The discussion of the baseball lacing design  deficiencies discussed in the EMC2 patent application may indeed apply.
Dan Tibbets
			 
			
					
				Re: Magrid design.
				Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:17 am
				by KitemanSA
				D Tibbets wrote:Long line cusps but narrower.
   Why do you think these would be narrower?  They are basically just the typical point cusps stretched all the way around the sphere several times.