hah!MSimon wrote:BTW the guy was not telling the "truth". He was expounding on received wisdom. i.e. a believer.
I'm a believer too. I place my faith in doubt.
Heh.
Christy Has Issues
-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:19 am
djolds1 wrote:There are a number of Left Field options or indicators beyond String Theology as GUT candidates. Heim (if accurate) is just a very mature version of LQG that got a 40 year head start. Woodward. HFGWs. And I'm right now looking at a left field 5D approach that is nearly as intuitively attractive as Heim and has Woodward's (Mach-Lorentz Thruster) endorsement.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Science is what we have learned about how not to fool ourselves about the way the world is.
-
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:35 am
-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:19 am
I think E8 and LQG have the best chance of succeeding. I think E8 in particular is going to continue to be filled in with LHC, though I don't think we'll have a theory in time for it to be predictive (it predicts new particles but cannot determine mass or spin). It's a visual fit.
Science is what we have learned about how not to fool ourselves about the way the world is.