Flying wing rotates for supersonic flight
Flying wing rotates for supersonic flight
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.
-
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:04 pm
- Location: Summerville SC, USA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oblique_wingrjaypeters wrote:What's wrong with an oblique wing?
That's a question best answered by having you pilot the vehicle while encountering wake turbulence behind, say, a 747.
I just prefer bilateral symmetry.
All this gives you over a conventional swing-wing is one less pivot.
Big deal. The flight control disadvantages are not worth it. The asymmetrical control problems in non-smooth air become worse with speed.
-
- Posts: 4686
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm
It is a big deal. The box that links swing wings to the rest of an aircraft is the heaviest part of the aircraft. The Oblique wing avoids this.DeltaV wrote:All this gives you over a conventional swing-wing is one less pivot. Big deal.
I would agree though that Oblique and star-shaped wings make little sense for other reasons. NIAC has made some very poor choices this last year.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis
Problems of High Speed and Altitude
Page 6:
The only desirable asymmetry is the transient kind, for control.
Page 6:
So you'll need bigger control surfaces, heftier actuators and stronger structure on the leading wing half. There goes your weight advantage.NASA Oblique Wing Test Vehicles
Stability and control issues
abound: The fact that birds and
insects are symmetric should give
us a clue (though they use huge
asymmetry for control)
– Strong aerodynamic and inertial
longitudinal-lateral-directional
coupling
– High side force at zero sideslip
angle
– Torsional divergence of the
leading wing
The only desirable asymmetry is the transient kind, for control.
-
- Posts: 4686
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:17 pm
Agreed. This bi-directional configuration loses the mass for a variable geometry wing, but gains the mass for twisting the engine location/direction, the cockpit, even the seats. There are so many needless complications here one fails to see how anyone could fund it. yeah, you can do a study with an RC aircraft for $10,000 but after that it should be obvious this is not a good idea.DeltaV wrote:The only desirable asymmetry is the transient kind, for control.
I'm very disappointed with what NIAC II has come up with. The technologists at NASA seem to lack common sense.
"Courage is not just a virtue, but the form of every virtue at the testing point." C. S. Lewis
-
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:04 pm
- Location: Summerville SC, USA
Thanks for the enlightenment re: "what's wrong with an oblique wing?" In my experience, those who insist upon bilateral symmetry for its own sake tend to be limited in flexibility of thought.
Not liking oblique wings because of the raft of problems they bring is another situation...
Not liking oblique wings because of the raft of problems they bring is another situation...
"Aqaba! By Land!" T. E. Lawrence
R. Peters
R. Peters