What an evil mind!DeltaV wrote:My plan worked! (At least the subplan of getting chris to post his fusion centrifuge thingy.)
Commercial fusion race heats up
You never saw this?DeltaV wrote:My plan worked! (At least the subplan of getting chris to post his fusion centrifuge thingy.)
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2009/0033249.html
Or the rotating glow posted on fusor.net?
My man has some mad chops!
Currently there is no "FAQ" on this subject, but if someone is willing to "Ask the Question" and write a good answer, I'd be most willing to insert it. I would like more than just a list of links. Company name, type of machine, known or suspected funding level, chief scientist, WAG and whether and how soon, that sort of thing.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Slough is behind both Helion energy and MSNW. From what I understand MSNW is doing the academic research while Helion is doing the commercialization of it.
Here is the direct link to the Helion homepage:
http://www.helionenergy.com/
Here is the direct link to the Helion homepage:
http://www.helionenergy.com/
... well done. about time!DeltaV wrote:My plan worked! (At least the subplan of getting chris to post his fusion centrifuge thingy.)chrismb wrote:DV, maybe you can edit my URL into your list. I guess it's overdue that I should start feeding in a few 'spoilers' on my work?
http://www.crossedfields.com/
...
whats with the patent app and some further technical disclosures/content Chris?
(ps. i can offer you a css stylesheet for your web age if you want, though i note this sort of 'anti-style' seems popular amongst physicists).
Nope (shock, awe). So many posts, so little time... The patent application has the word "fusion", so I moved him up a couple of lines. Now if I had time to actually read it...seedload wrote:You never saw this?DeltaV wrote:My plan worked! (At least the subplan of getting chris to post his fusion centrifuge thingy.)
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2009/0033249.html
http://www.emc2fusion.org/
[ http://www.helionenergy.com/ http://www.msnwllc.com/index.html ]
http://www.lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.com/
http://www.fpgeneration.com/
http://www.generalfusion.com/
http://www.n-plasma.com/index.html
http://www.crossedfields.com/
http://www.hyperv.com/index.html
http://mifti.com/home
http://investing.businessweek.com/resea ... Id=2113506
Nope. Got a link?seedload wrote:Or the rotating glow posted on fusor.net?
Saw this linked from there, only 2 of 10 teams in common with the above list:
http://www.bnet.com/blog/energy/ten-ser ... world/2897
Probably one of these:DeltaV wrote:Nope. Got a link?seedload wrote:Or the rotating glow posted on fusor.net?
http://www.fusor.net/board/view.php?bn= ... 1262438568
http://www.fusor.net/board/view.php?bn= ... 1264282158
The post at the first link contains images of the device and the rubicund toroidal plasma. The post at the second link contains links to a couple of YouTube videos.
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.
Thanks, I'd forgotten about those. EPS website has a 2002 copyright, hasn't been updated in years.
Added to list (final order to be determined...):
http://www.emc2fusion.org/
[ http://www.helionenergy.com/ http://www.msnwllc.com/index.html ]
http://www.lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.com/
http://www.fpgeneration.com/
http://www.generalfusion.com/
http://www.n-plasma.com/index.html
http://www.crossedfields.com/
http://electronpowersystems.com/
http://www.prometheus2.net/
http://www.hyperv.com/index.html
http://mifti.com/home
http://www.crossfirefusion.com
http://investing.businessweek.com/resea ... Id=2113506
Added to list (final order to be determined...):
http://www.emc2fusion.org/
[ http://www.helionenergy.com/ http://www.msnwllc.com/index.html ]
http://www.lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.com/
http://www.fpgeneration.com/
http://www.generalfusion.com/
http://www.n-plasma.com/index.html
http://www.crossedfields.com/
http://electronpowersystems.com/
http://www.prometheus2.net/
http://www.hyperv.com/index.html
http://mifti.com/home
http://www.crossfirefusion.com
http://investing.businessweek.com/resea ... Id=2113506
Are there any hard and fast standards on what can be thrown into the pot? I'm sure I could come up with quite a few. For now I'll just draw your attention to this variation on the standard fusor:
http://www.beeresearch.com.au/
The diagram here reminds me of my childhood thought experiments regarding what would happen if I jumped into a hole through the earth, although I didn't consider the possibility of someone jumping in after me.
http://www.beeresearch.com.au/
The diagram here reminds me of my childhood thought experiments regarding what would happen if I jumped into a hole through the earth, although I didn't consider the possibility of someone jumping in after me.
Temperature, density, confinement time: pick any two.
DV, I think you are over-listing here. You're gonna end up with my 'List of Fusion Technologies' list if you keep going (from which I already deleted someone's addition of 'crossfire fusion' off of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fu ... chnologies).
You should make some rules like "is there IP protection and/or do they have accounts and aim for profits/licence sales", something like that. Maybe also, 'reported activity in the last 6 months' might help whittle away the 'also-ran's from the runners.
You should make some rules like "is there IP protection and/or do they have accounts and aim for profits/licence sales", something like that. Maybe also, 'reported activity in the last 6 months' might help whittle away the 'also-ran's from the runners.