Of course there was. The Republican-Amurcn teatraitors put everything they could think of in to sabotage it, same as they're sabotaging the US' economy.choff wrote:If you checkout the history of nationalized healthcare in every other western country what you find is that they set it up before the advent of computers. In my country, we actually have 10 provincial healthcare programs. The provinces do the admin, the Feds share cost and maintain uniform standards.
It's very difficult to believe there wasn't a deliberate intention to fail at work in the U.S.
It Needed Five Years Of Construction And A Year Of Testing
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: It Needed Five Years Of Construction And A Year Of Testi
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.
Re: It Needed Five Years Of Construction And A Year Of Testi
http://blog.isthereaproblemhere.com/201 ... d.html?m=1
Anyone still buy the argument that the site's problems are just too much demand?
Via http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/178192/
More at link.I started an insurance application at Healthcare.gov in search of options for a family member who is not covered by my employer's plan.
I abandoned the application. The status screen shows that my application is "In progress".
However, I got a notification that my application had been processed and my eligibility results are available.
How is it that my application was processed when I did not submit the application?
Anyone still buy the argument that the site's problems are just too much demand?
Via http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/178192/
The daylight is uncomfortably bright for eyes so long in the dark.
Re: It Needed Five Years Of Construction And A Year Of Testi
They're supposed to have it 'fixed' by the end of November... but I think that's very optimistic.hanelyp wrote:http://blog.isthereaproblemhere.com/201 ... d.html?m=1More at link.I started an insurance application at Healthcare.gov in search of options for a family member who is not covered by my employer's plan.
I abandoned the application. The status screen shows that my application is "In progress".
However, I got a notification that my application had been processed and my eligibility results are available.
How is it that my application was processed when I did not submit the application?
Anyone still buy the argument that the site's problems are just too much demand?
Via http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/178192/
But even if they do - once people can easily see the numbers and compare to what they've got now (or had) - there's going to be a lot of unhappy people out there.
When opinion and reality conflict - guess which one is going to win in the long run.
-
Schneibster
- Posts: 1805
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:21 am
- Location: Monterey, CA, USA
Re: It Needed Five Years Of Construction And A Year Of Testi
We wanted the public option.
You didn't.
Just sayin'.
You didn't.
Just sayin'.
We need a directorate of science, and we need it to be voted on only by scientists. You don't get to vote on reality. Get over it. Elected officials that deny the findings of the Science Directorate are subject to immediate impeachment for incompetence.