williatw wrote:
Yes he should have hammered her more on the private e-mail server; it wasn't merely a "mistake" it was a crime; in spite of what the FBI said in its report the statute doesn't give a by to blundering "good intentions". Unfortunately the public doesn't seem to care;
And here is where I once again attempt to make my eternal point. The public doesn't care because the Media (Liberal Democrat Union Members from New York) do everything they can to subdue public reaction to what she has done. Had the Media treated her as they did Richard Nixon (Constant, 24 hour, 7 day a week assertions of corruption) she would be toast.
As Peter Jennings (Former ABC News Reader) said: "We don't tell the people what to think. We tell them what to think about."
The media steers public opinion, and all the "steerers" are Hyper partisan Left Wing Democrat Liberals. There are no conservatives in any positions of control in those businesses. Even Fox news has made a hard turn to the left now that the Network has been taken over by the Hyper Liberal sons of Rupert Murdoch.
williatw wrote:
Trump needs to do a better job of showing how someone with "30 years" experience in government doesn't get a pass for incompetence. He didn't say one stinking word about her incompetent complicity in the Benghazi debacle; he needs to showcase her failures and unwillingness to admit such.
I noticed that, and I was thinking at the time, "Is he going to bring up the Benghazi disaster?" He didn't, and of course the "moderator" didn't either. (Or anything else significantly deleterious to Hillary.)
williatw wrote:
He tried to hit her hard on her (&Obama's) complicity in allowing ISIS to grow; mixed results there, she said it was Bush who negotiated the forces withdrawal agreement (true) but sorry you don't get a pass when it (the growth of ISIS) happens on your 8 year watch.
Bush negotiated the initial forces agreement, but Obama didn't want to continue it, so when the Iraqi's demanded more concessions, Obama pulled out because that's what he wanted to do anyway. But this is beyond just pulling our forces out of Iraq, (which was a colossally stupid blunder) the evidence so far appears to indicate that Obama and Hillary were running a
"fast and furious" gun running scheme to the "Syrian Rebels" which were in fact the Core group we now know as "ISIS."
Obama and Hillary
*ARMED* ISIS. They not only allowed it to be created by removing our troops, they actually fertilized it's growth by sending it weapons and money. They foolishly thought that arming these groups which were fighting Assad would be useful in toppling Assad. (Which I still think they were doing only because Bush toppled Saddam Hussein, and they wanted to prove they were just as "bad ass" as Bush was.)
I read yesterday that Wikileaks is making exactly this charge; That Hillary deliberately sent weapons and military supplies to the forces which mutated into ISIS.
That
*IS* what the evidence appears to indicate.
williatw wrote:
The bias (on the media's part) of labeling Trump saying we should have taken (secured) the Iraq's oil fields as "crazy" show what he is up against.
I keep telling people that the greatest threat currently facing the nation is one party control of all significant information streams in the country. The Liberal Democrat Media are enabling a fascist-like super-government to coalesce and form around the Democrat-ran nanny state. (80% of Federal government employees are Democrats.)
There is a Media-Industrial complex operating between the Wealthy Elite of New England/New York, and the Washington D.C. money-fountain/power structure. I used to wonder why people would not want to balance the budget and stop deficit spending, but that was because I was looking at the problem the way a patriotic and objective American should look at the problem.
When you look at the problem from the perspective of people getting rich and holding on to power as a result of excessive spending on the part of Government, you realize this better explains the behavior we are seeing. They don't want to rein in spending or government involvement in things like Healthcare, because that is how their bread is getting buttered.
The media does exactly what it's Wealthy power broker owners (This Century's "Robber Barons" ) wants it to do, because this is how they keep their power and influence. That the media should serve the interests of the entire nation I have now come to realize is just a naive fantasy.
‘What all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass.’
— Lord Melbourne —
