Actually I don't equate them. One is a group of organizations backed by the establishment ruling class, determined to suck the country dry for their ill gotten benefits and priviledges and impose their kind of totaltarianism upon us, the whole thing being centrally planned by people working for big unions and the likes of george Soros. the other is a bunch of people representing a cross section of the nation gathering together enmasse for thefirst time to make a statement about the establishment ruling class's ever increasing greed and the consequences of an avericious government on the country. No equality there at all.ScottL wrote:I don't see a political party nor elected official at these rallies in the pictures. How you equate the Tea Party to an Anti-War rally, is beyond me.Jccarlton wrote:How about commenting on the garbage that we have been taking from the left for decades before trying to find imaginary racism in the tea party:ScottL wrote:I don't think too many groups are interviewing the entire Tea party to ask. I put more merit on the elected officals of the "Party," but it's also up to them to set good examples and to stop such rhetoric. I can't remember too many speeches by Tea Party officials where they asked that party-goers remove said placards. My concerns are not with the debt movement on this issue, but on the indifference of so many at the actions of a few.
http://www.zombietime.com/hall_of_shame/
A responce to CoolbruceLong
Jccarlton wrote: I find it amazing that lefties always have to try to find the bogeyman leaders even when they are fantasies.
The phrase "The pot calling the kettle black" is an idiom used to accuse a person of being guilty of the very thing they are pointing out. This may or may not be hypocritical or a contradiction...but “Remember ‘We Report, You Decide,’ back when Fox News began?”then Jccarlton wrote: One is a group of organizations backed by the establishment ruling class, determined to suck the country dry for their ill gotten benefits and priviledges and impose their kind of totaltarianism upon us, the whole thing being centrally planned by people working for big unions and the likes of george Soros.
So you would raise taxes further on the people in this country who actually do the work, so those who don't can keep getting their government benefits?ScottL the theftist IDIOT wrote:At this point in time we need a centrist method. Cutting to certain programs while increasing revenue.
There will be no recovery until the punishment of the producers lightens and the benefits to the freeloaders are cut.
One thing about being an engineer is that you are expected to deal with facts, not assertions. After all if you make a mistake people can die. That means that you constantly have to fact check yourself: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/view ... asp?id=589Axil wrote:Jccarlton wrote: I find it amazing that lefties always have to try to find the bogeyman leaders even when they are fantasies.
The phrase "The pot calling the kettle black" is an idiom used to accuse a person of being guilty of the very thing they are pointing out. This may or may not be hypocritical or a contradiction...but “Remember ‘We Report, You Decide,’ back when Fox News began?”then Jccarlton wrote: One is a group of organizations backed by the establishment ruling class, determined to suck the country dry for their ill gotten benefits and priviledges and impose their kind of totaltarianism upon us, the whole thing being centrally planned by people working for big unions and the likes of george Soros.
about many things:
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/07/1 ... ss-and-the
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2011/08 ... nment.html
http://www.nas.org/polArticles.cfm?doct ... oc_id=2062
and on and on.
Frankly, any realistic study of the patterns of history should warn one about following the patterns that our current "ruling elites" are following. But they stopped teaching the classics as core requirments at Harvard and Yale a long time ago.
I personally would retain the current Bush tax cuts for individuals and small business. I would, however; hike taxes on corporations that outsource. You want to be U.S. based and sell to U.S. consumers, you better hire U.S. people. This is a temporary solution though.hanelyp wrote:So you would raise taxes further on the people in this country who actually do the work, so those who don't can keep getting their government benefits?ScottL the theftist IDIOT wrote:At this point in time we need a centrist method. Cutting to certain programs while increasing revenue.
There will be no recovery until the punishment of the producers lightens and the benefits to the freeloaders are cut.
We should be looking into contracts within our continent at this point. Borders and fences aren't the answer to dissuading immigrants, especially when there are so many menial jobs they do that U.S. citizens wouldn't consider (IE: farm labor not tied to the federal minimum wage). The best way to stop "illegal" immigration is to give them options in their country.
hanelyp wrote:So you would raise taxes further on the people in this country who actually do the work, so those who don't can keep getting their government benefits?ScottL the theftist IDIOT wrote:At this point in time we need a centrist method. Cutting to certain programs while increasing revenue.
There will be no recovery until the punishment of the producers lightens and the benefits to the freeloaders are cut.
Whoa Whoa Whoa, name calling? Not once has any other poster within these topics degenerated to name calling....not once!
Wanted to add this just incase you missed it.
1. Be polite. No flames, insults, personal attacks, or other unprofessional behavior.
2. No posts consisting only of a link. If you have something to say, say it; if it's just a link, it belongs on a links page (like this one).
3. Use full sentences, and standard English spelling, punctuation, and grammar as much as possible.
4. You are encouraged (though not required) to use your real name rather than some silly handle. This is a forum for grown-ups.
You must therefore regard American jobs as a commodity like wheat that can be freely exported without restrictions.TDPerk wrote:"I would, however; hike taxes on corporations that outsource."
Sure, protectionism like Smoot-Hawley was such a great idea the first time.
Are you in the jobs export business?
Here's a economic theory that was devised by an engineer and rejected by economists, though Keynes himself admitted it was one of the only ideas out there that attempted to deal with the problem of long term debt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit
CHoff
Production for Use:choff wrote:Here's a economic theory that was devised by an engineer and rejected by economists, though Keynes himself admitted it was one of the only ideas out there that attempted to deal with the problem of long term debt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit
http://www.worldsocialism.org/canada/pr ... 36n268.htm
And if you want to see a funny movie about it:
http://www.archive.org/details/his_girl_friday
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.