Kid's Pot Use Up
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:36 am
a discussion forum for Polywell fusion
https://talk-polywell.org/bb/
I propose that those heavy into alcohol switch to pot. It is safer. Evidently the kids have wised up to the fact. The "adults" seem to remain on the stupid side. But the OFs are dying off. It is no longer a matter of if, just when.seedload wrote:Fantastic! Great news! Bold it!
Again, have you changed from advocating for drug legalization to advocating for drug use?
The reply was inspired by the post that the smart kids are smoking pot.MSimon wrote:The post was inspired by a bunch of comments by those who said pot use among kids was down.
And the stupid kids are still getting drunk.seedload wrote:The reply was inspired by the post that the smart kids are smoking pot.MSimon wrote:The post was inspired by a bunch of comments by those who said pot use among kids was down.
It's only safer if you don't mind developing cannabis psychosis and other permanent cognitive impairment.MSimon wrote:I propose that those heavy into alcohol switch to pot. It is safer.
I am not an expert in the field, but I think that lung wise smoke is smoke.quixote wrote:Out of curiosity, how does smoking pot compare with smoking cigarettes with regard to its effect on the lungs? From what I've read in a casual google search, it seems to be much worse, but I haven't seen too much info on it.
Do you guys have any decent sources?
He didn't say that pot is safe, he proposed that "those heavy into alcohol switch to pot. It is safer."GIThruster wrote:It's only safer if you don't mind developing cannabis psychosis and other permanent cognitive impairment.MSimon wrote:I propose that those heavy into alcohol switch to pot. It is safer.
http://priory.com/psych/cannabis.htm
There is NOTHING safe about pot.
No. That is government propaganda.Giorgio wrote:I am not an expert in the field, but I think that lung wise smoke is smoke.quixote wrote:Out of curiosity, how does smoking pot compare with smoking cigarettes with regard to its effect on the lungs? From what I've read in a casual google search, it seems to be much worse, but I haven't seen too much info on it.
Do you guys have any decent sources?
the International Conference of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) concluding that smoking marijuana, even long-term, is not positively associated with increased incidence of lung-cancer
While the investigators’ failure to demonstrate a positive association between cannabis use and cancer may seem surprising to some, the bottom line is that scientists overseas have been studying pot’s potential anti-cancer properties for nearly a decade. Most recently, investigators at Italy's Instuto di Chemica Biomolecolare reported in the May issue of the Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics that compounds in marijuana inhibit cancer cell growth in animals and in culture on a wide range of tumor cell lines, including human breast carcinoma cells, human prostate carcinoma cells, and human colectoral carcinoma cells.
All from: http://www.drugscience.org/Archive/bcr1 ... ntano.html
More like water is safer than wine. Both will kill you if you drink enough. But you have to drink a lot more water at a sitting.ladajo wrote:This is starting to sound like arguing that Full Metal Jacketed rounds are safer to shoot people with than Hollow Points.