Talk-Polywell.org

1. Eckert’s abdominal area was x-rayed; no narcotics were found.

2. Doctors then performed an exam of Eckert’s anus with their fingers; no narcotics were found.

3. Doctors performed a second exam of Eckert’s anus with their fingers; no narcotics were found.

4. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.

5. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema a second time. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.

6. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema a third time. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.

7. Doctors then x-rayed Eckert again; no narcotics were found.

8. Doctors prepared Eckert for surgery, sedated him, and then performed a colonoscopy where a scope with a camera was inserted into Eckert’s anus, rectum, colon, and large intestines. No narcotics were found.

Throughout this ordeal, Eckert protested and never gave doctors at the Gila Regional Medical Center consent to perform any of these medical procedures….

http://classicalvalues.com/2013/11/in-t ... ur-rectum/

MSimon wrote:
The guilty have rights and are generally treated accordingly. The innocent have no rights.

Welcome to America. Land of the free.

BTW lots more links at the link.

186 Speaking of old business, that guy who got the anal probing in New Mexico ws known to hide drugs up there and had been arrested for possessing meth in 2012.

Prison trivia: At least around here, hiding items where the sun don't shine is known as "keistering."

Posted by: WalrusRex at November 07, 2013 03:33 PM (Hx5uv)

the situation will worsen as Obamacare kicks in, because of the mandatory drug treatment coverage. The drug treatment community wants to cash in and they will see keeping drugs illegal as the best guarantor of a continued supply of captive customers.

http://classicalvalues.com/2013/11/in-t ... ment-94772

A records search for David W. Eckert’s past criminal history returns several results. The most recent drug-related arrest appears to have been in 2012. A section on the record, however, says the case was “dismissed by prosecutor.”

He was charged with possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine), a felony, in the case. The state of New Mexico entered a “nolle prosequie” motion, meaning it found it was not in the state’s best interest to prosecute, according to court records.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/11 ... ntroversy/